TY - GEN
T1 - A comparison of Direct and Indirect Haptic Aiding for Remotely Piloted Vehicles
AU - Alaimo, Samantha M.C.
AU - Pollini, Lorenzo
AU - Bresciani, Jean Pierre
AU - Bülthoff, Heinrich H.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - The paper presents an experimental evaluation of two different Haptic aiding concepts: Direct and Indirect Haptic Aiding. Two Haptic systems were designed and tested using an experimental setup. The problem of wind gust rejection in Remotely Piloted Vehicles is used as test bench. Test results show the effectiveness of both methods but a better performance of the IHA-based system for pilots without any previous training about the experiment. DHA-based system provided instead better results after some pilot training on the experiment. Pilots reported better sensation of the wind gusts with IHA-based feedback.
AB - The paper presents an experimental evaluation of two different Haptic aiding concepts: Direct and Indirect Haptic Aiding. Two Haptic systems were designed and tested using an experimental setup. The problem of wind gust rejection in Remotely Piloted Vehicles is used as test bench. Test results show the effectiveness of both methods but a better performance of the IHA-based system for pilots without any previous training about the experiment. DHA-based system provided instead better results after some pilot training on the experiment. Pilots reported better sensation of the wind gusts with IHA-based feedback.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649825743&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ROMAN.2010.5598647
DO - 10.1109/ROMAN.2010.5598647
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:78649825743
SN - 9781424479917
T3 - Proceedings - IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication
SP - 506
EP - 512
BT - 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN 2010
T2 - 19th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN 2010
Y2 - 12 September 2010 through 15 September 2010
ER -