A comparison of Direct and Indirect Haptic Aiding for Remotely Piloted Vehicles

Samantha M.C. Alaimo; Lorenzo Pollini; Jean Pierre Bresciani; Heinrich H. Bülthoff

doi:10.1109/ROMAN.2010.5598647

A comparison of Direct and Indirect Haptic Aiding for Remotely Piloted Vehicles

Samantha M.C. Alaimo, Lorenzo Pollini, Jean Pierre Bresciani, Heinrich H. Bülthoff

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The paper presents an experimental evaluation of two different Haptic aiding concepts: Direct and Indirect Haptic Aiding. Two Haptic systems were designed and tested using an experimental setup. The problem of wind gust rejection in Remotely Piloted Vehicles is used as test bench. Test results show the effectiveness of both methods but a better performance of the IHA-based system for pilots without any previous training about the experiment. DHA-based system provided instead better results after some pilot training on the experiment. Pilots reported better sensation of the wind gusts with IHA-based feedback.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN 2010
Pages	506-512
Number of pages	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2010.5598647
Publication status	Published - 2010
Event	19th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN 2010 - Viareggio, Italy Duration: 2010 Sept 12 → 2010 Sept 15

Publication series

Name	Proceedings - IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication

Other

Other	19th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN 2010
Country/Territory	Italy
City	Viareggio
Period	10/9/12 → 10/9/15

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Software
Artificial Intelligence
Human-Computer Interaction

Access to Document

10.1109/ROMAN.2010.5598647

Cite this

Alaimo, S. M. C., Pollini, L., Bresciani, J. P., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2010). A comparison of Direct and Indirect Haptic Aiding for Remotely Piloted Vehicles. In 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN 2010 (pp. 506-512). Article 5598647 (Proceedings - IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication). https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2010.5598647

A comparison of Direct and Indirect Haptic Aiding for Remotely Piloted Vehicles. / Alaimo, Samantha M.C.; Pollini, Lorenzo; Bresciani, Jean Pierre et al.
19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN 2010. 2010. p. 506-512 5598647 (Proceedings - IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Alaimo, SMC, Pollini, L, Bresciani, JP & Bülthoff, HH 2010, A comparison of Direct and Indirect Haptic Aiding for Remotely Piloted Vehicles. in 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN 2010., 5598647, Proceedings - IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 506-512, 19th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN 2010, Viareggio, Italy, 10/9/12. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2010.5598647

Alaimo SMC, Pollini L, Bresciani JP, Bülthoff HH. A comparison of Direct and Indirect Haptic Aiding for Remotely Piloted Vehicles. In 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN 2010. 2010. p. 506-512. 5598647. (Proceedings - IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication). doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2010.5598647

@inproceedings{25610482e6cc468fb7c599d8aa387303,

title = "A comparison of Direct and Indirect Haptic Aiding for Remotely Piloted Vehicles",

abstract = "The paper presents an experimental evaluation of two different Haptic aiding concepts: Direct and Indirect Haptic Aiding. Two Haptic systems were designed and tested using an experimental setup. The problem of wind gust rejection in Remotely Piloted Vehicles is used as test bench. Test results show the effectiveness of both methods but a better performance of the IHA-based system for pilots without any previous training about the experiment. DHA-based system provided instead better results after some pilot training on the experiment. Pilots reported better sensation of the wind gusts with IHA-based feedback.",

author = "Alaimo, \{Samantha M.C.\} and Lorenzo Pollini and Bresciani, \{Jean Pierre\} and B{\"u}lthoff, \{Heinrich H.\}",

year = "2010",

doi = "10.1109/ROMAN.2010.5598647",

language = "English",

isbn = "9781424479917",

series = "Proceedings - IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication",

pages = "506--512",

booktitle = "19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN 2010",

note = "19th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN 2010 ; Conference date: 12-09-2010 Through 15-09-2010",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - A comparison of Direct and Indirect Haptic Aiding for Remotely Piloted Vehicles

AU - Alaimo, Samantha M.C.

AU - Pollini, Lorenzo

AU - Bresciani, Jean Pierre

AU - Bülthoff, Heinrich H.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The paper presents an experimental evaluation of two different Haptic aiding concepts: Direct and Indirect Haptic Aiding. Two Haptic systems were designed and tested using an experimental setup. The problem of wind gust rejection in Remotely Piloted Vehicles is used as test bench. Test results show the effectiveness of both methods but a better performance of the IHA-based system for pilots without any previous training about the experiment. DHA-based system provided instead better results after some pilot training on the experiment. Pilots reported better sensation of the wind gusts with IHA-based feedback.

AB - The paper presents an experimental evaluation of two different Haptic aiding concepts: Direct and Indirect Haptic Aiding. Two Haptic systems were designed and tested using an experimental setup. The problem of wind gust rejection in Remotely Piloted Vehicles is used as test bench. Test results show the effectiveness of both methods but a better performance of the IHA-based system for pilots without any previous training about the experiment. DHA-based system provided instead better results after some pilot training on the experiment. Pilots reported better sensation of the wind gusts with IHA-based feedback.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/78649825743

U2 - 10.1109/ROMAN.2010.5598647

DO - 10.1109/ROMAN.2010.5598647

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:78649825743

SN - 9781424479917

T3 - Proceedings - IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication

SP - 506

EP - 512

BT - 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN 2010

T2 - 19th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN 2010

Y2 - 12 September 2010 through 15 September 2010

ER -

A comparison of Direct and Indirect Haptic Aiding for Remotely Piloted Vehicles

Abstract

Publication series

Other

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this