Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A review on robotic surgery in rectal cancer

  • Zairul Azwan Mohd Azman
  • , Seon Hahn Kim*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Robotic surgery has the upper hand when compared to the laparoscopic approach in terms of superior visualisation, flexibility in movement, steadiness and accessibility to confined anatomical spaces. Nevertheless, limitations still exist with regards to cost, reduced tactile sensation, time-consuming setup and a significant learning curve to achieve. Although studies have shown better or at least comparable outcomes between the robotic and laparoscopic approach, the limitations mentioned result in poor penetrance among centres and surgeons. Advancements in robotic surgery technology and attaining the acquired skillset will translate into better clinical outcomes for patients.

Original languageEnglish
JournalTranslational Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume2016
Issue numberMAR
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology. All rights reserved.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Minimally invasive surgery (MIS)
  • Rectal dissection
  • Robotic surgery
  • Robotic-assisted surgery
  • Total mesorectal excision (TME)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A review on robotic surgery in rectal cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this