Abstract
Robotic surgery has the upper hand when compared to the laparoscopic approach in terms of superior visualisation, flexibility in movement, steadiness and accessibility to confined anatomical spaces. Nevertheless, limitations still exist with regards to cost, reduced tactile sensation, time-consuming setup and a significant learning curve to achieve. Although studies have shown better or at least comparable outcomes between the robotic and laparoscopic approach, the limitations mentioned result in poor penetrance among centres and surgeons. Advancements in robotic surgery technology and attaining the acquired skillset will translate into better clinical outcomes for patients.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology |
| Volume | 2016 |
| Issue number | MAR |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology. All rights reserved.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Minimally invasive surgery (MIS)
- Rectal dissection
- Robotic surgery
- Robotic-assisted surgery
- Total mesorectal excision (TME)
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Hepatology
- Gastroenterology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A review on robotic surgery in rectal cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS