Abstract
This study compared the accuracy of a new MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry system, ASTA MicroIDSys system, with that of MALDI Biotyper system for the identification of reference and clinical bacterial and yeast strains. The identification accuracy of the 2 systems was compared using a total of 406 strains comprising 142 aerobic and 180 anaerobic bacterial strains and 84 yeast strains. The genus and species identification rates were 98.0% and 89.4% using MicroIDSys and 96.1% and 89.4% using Biotyper, respectively. The species identification rates of MicroIDSys and Biotyper for aerobic bacteria were 93.0% and 97.2%, respectively, and those for anaerobic bacteria were 85.6% and 81.7%, respectively. The accuracy of yeast identification at the species level was 91.7% using MicroIDSys and 92.9% using Biotyper. These findings indicate that MicroIDSys could be useful for the accurate identification of bacteria and yeast in clinical microbiology laboratories.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 115658 |
| Journal | Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease |
| Volume | 103 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2022 May |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2022
Keywords
- ASTA MicroIDSys system
- Bacteria
- Bruker biotyper system
- Identification
- MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry
- Yeast
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Microbiology (medical)
- Infectious Diseases