Age and Clinically Actionable Events in Patients With Implantable Loop Recorders: Analysis of Multicenter Loop Recorder Registry

  • Joo Hee Jeong
  • , So Ryoung Lee
  • , Il Young Oh
  • , Myung Jin Cha
  • , Hong Euy Lim
  • , Hyoung Seob Park
  • , Pil Sung Yang
  • , Sung Ho Lee
  • , Junbeom Park
  • , Ki Hun Kim
  • , Jun Hyung Kim
  • , Jae Sun Uhm
  • , Jin Hee Ahn
  • , Jumsuk Ko
  • , Ju Youn Kim*
  • , Jaemin Shim*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Little is known about age and clinical intervention after implantable loop recorder (ILR) insertion. This study investigated the association between age and clinical intervention after ILR implantation. Methods and Results: Data were obtained from a multicenter registry of ILR in Korea (2017–2020, n = 795). ILRs were inserted with indications of unexplained syncope, recurrent palpitation, or cryptogenic stroke. The primary outcome was clinically actionable event that was a composite of the newly detected atrial fibrillation (AF), pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation, catheter ablation, and anticoagulation initiation. The mean age was 64.3 years, and the mean follow-up duration was 20.6 months. Clinically actionable events were observed in 322 (40.5%) patients. Compared to younger age (< 50 years), older age (≥ 50 years) showed higher prevalence of newly detected AF (3.7% vs. 15.8%; p = 0.001), pacemaker implantation (11.2% vs. 21.2%; p = 0.022), and initiation of anticoagulation (3.7% vs. 18.6%; p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in ICD implantation (1.9% vs. 1.3%; p = 0.996) or catheter ablation (3.8% vs. 6.0%; p = 0.512). The older age group more frequently experienced clinically actionable events compared to the younger age group (hazard ratio 2.52, 95% confidence interval: 1.86–3.41; p < 0.001). A significant association was found in the increase of age (per 1-year) and the risk of clinically actionable events (adjusted hazard ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 1.02–1.04; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Advanced age is a significant risk factor for clinical intervention after ILR insertion. ILR should be considered more actively in older patients requiring prolonged rhythm monitoring.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)266-275
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025 Jan

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Keywords

  • age
  • atrial fibrillation
  • bradyarrhythmia
  • implantable loop recorder
  • tachyarrhythmia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Age and Clinically Actionable Events in Patients With Implantable Loop Recorders: Analysis of Multicenter Loop Recorder Registry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this