An equivalent network for divisible load scheduling in nonblocking mode of communication

S. Suresh, V. Mani, S. N. Omkar, H. J. Kim*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Scheduling divisible loads in nonblocking mode of communication in a single-level tree network is considered. For this scheduling problem, an equivalent single-level tree network in blocking mode of communication is derived. This equivalent network can be easily obtained by changing the speed parameters of the processors in the network. The advantages of this equivalent network are that we can easily obtain the results on when to distribute the load to processors in the network, optimal sequencing and arrangement of processors and the effect of start-up time in nonblocking mode of communication. Numerical examples are presented for ease of understanding the equivalent network concept.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1413-1431
    Number of pages19
    JournalComputers and Mathematics with Applications
    Volume49
    Issue number9-10
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2005 May

    Bibliographical note

    Funding Information:
    This paper was in part supported by the Media Services Research Center (MSRC-ITRC), Kangwon National University, Korea. Discussions with Prof. D. Ghose is gratefully acknowledged. *Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed, 0898-1221/05/$ - see front matter (~) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2004.11.013

    Keywords

    • Blocking and nonblocking mode of communication
    • Divisible loads
    • Equivalent network
    • Processing time
    • Single-level tree network

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Modelling and Simulation
    • Computational Theory and Mathematics
    • Computational Mathematics

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'An equivalent network for divisible load scheduling in nonblocking mode of communication'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this