TY - JOUR
T1 - An unexpected role for visual feedback in vehicle steering control
AU - Wallis, Guy
AU - Chatziastros, Astros
AU - Bülthoff, Heinrich
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Motor Accident Insurance Commission of Queensland, Australia and the Max Planck Society, Germany.
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - Some motor tasks can be completed, quite literally, with our eyes shut. Most people can touch their nose without looking or reach for an object after only a brief glance at its location. This distinction leads to one of the defining questions of movement control: is information gleaned prior to starting the movement sufficient to complete the task (open loop), or is feedback about the progress of the movement required (closed loop)? One task that has commanded considerable interest in the literature over the years is that of steering a vehicle, in particular lane-correction and lane-changing tasks. Recent work has suggested that this type of task can proceed in a fundamentally open loop manner [1, 2], with feedback mainly serving to correct minor, accumulating errors. This paper reevaluates the conclusions of these studies by conducting a new set of experiments in a driving simulator. We demonstrate that, in fact, drivers rely on regular visual feedback, even during the well-practiced steering task of lane changing. Without feedback, drivers fail to initiate the return phase of the maneuver, resulting in systematic errors in final heading. The results provide new insight into the control of vehicle heading, suggesting that drivers employ a simple policy of "turn and see," with only limited understanding of the relationship between steering angle and vehicle heading.
AB - Some motor tasks can be completed, quite literally, with our eyes shut. Most people can touch their nose without looking or reach for an object after only a brief glance at its location. This distinction leads to one of the defining questions of movement control: is information gleaned prior to starting the movement sufficient to complete the task (open loop), or is feedback about the progress of the movement required (closed loop)? One task that has commanded considerable interest in the literature over the years is that of steering a vehicle, in particular lane-correction and lane-changing tasks. Recent work has suggested that this type of task can proceed in a fundamentally open loop manner [1, 2], with feedback mainly serving to correct minor, accumulating errors. This paper reevaluates the conclusions of these studies by conducting a new set of experiments in a driving simulator. We demonstrate that, in fact, drivers rely on regular visual feedback, even during the well-practiced steering task of lane changing. Without feedback, drivers fail to initiate the return phase of the maneuver, resulting in systematic errors in final heading. The results provide new insight into the control of vehicle heading, suggesting that drivers employ a simple policy of "turn and see," with only limited understanding of the relationship between steering angle and vehicle heading.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037133035&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00685-1
DO - 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00685-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 11864569
AN - SCOPUS:0037133035
SN - 0960-9822
VL - 12
SP - 295
EP - 299
JO - Current Biology
JF - Current Biology
IS - 4
M1 - 1609
ER -