Beam test results of a large forward Resistive Plate Chamber for the CMS/LHC

S. H. Ahn, S. Y. Bahk, J. H. Choi, B. Hong, S. J. Hong, Y. J. Kim, J. Y. Kim, S. J. Kim, Y. U. Kim, D. K. Koo, S. J. Lee, K. S. Lee, I. T. Lim, S. K. Nam, M. Y. Pac, S. K. Park, J. T. Rhee, K. S. Sim, J. T. Yang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The first real size Resistive Plate Chamber (RPC) prototype of ME2/1 for the forward region of the Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) detector was constructed at Korea Detector Laboratory (KODEL). The parallel resistive electrodes of the double gap RPC were made of bakelite whose resistivity was 5×109 Ω cm. The prototype was tested at the Gamma Irradiation Facility (GIF) of CERN in an environment of the background intensity ranging up to 1 kHz/cm2/gap. We report that the full efficiency of 98% has been achieved with time resolution of about 1 ns. These results demonstrate that such a double gap RPC is suitable for the muon trigger in the future experiments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)31-36
Number of pages6
JournalNuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment
Volume443
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000 Mar 21

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We gratefully acknowledge F. Gaspirini, G. Iaselli, M. Maggi, I. Crotty, and M. Della Negra for discussions and helps. We also would like to thank G. Charpak for his invaluable encouragement and discussions. The authors wish to acknowledge the financial supports that Korea Research Foundation and the Ministry of Science and Technology of Korea made through the nuclear R&D program and the international cooperation program to this research in 1997 and 1998.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics
  • Instrumentation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Beam test results of a large forward Resistive Plate Chamber for the CMS/LHC'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this