Bivalirudin versus heparin as an antithrombotic agent in patients treated with a sirolimus-eluting stent

  • Seung Woon Rha
  • , Pramod K. Kuchulakanti
  • , Rajbabu Pakala
  • , Edouard Cheneau
  • , Jana A. Fournadjiev
  • , Ellen Pinnow
  • , Afework GebreEyesus
  • , George Aggrey
  • , Zuyue Wang
  • , Augusto D. Pichard
  • , Lowell F. Satler
  • , Kenneth M. Kent
  • , Joseph Lindsay
  • , Ron Waksman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Bivalirudin (Angiomax) is increasingly used as a substitute for heparin in a variety of percutaneous coronary interventions. This retrospective, observational study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin compared with heparin as an antithrombotic regimen in patients treated with sirolimus-eluting stents (Cypher) and found that bivalirudin is clinically safe and feasible, with fewer vascular and ischemic complications compared with heparin.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1047-1050
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Cardiology
Volume94
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004 Oct 15
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bivalirudin versus heparin as an antithrombotic agent in patients treated with a sirolimus-eluting stent'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this