Clinical Impact of Drug-Coated Balloon–Based Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

  • Eun Seok Shin*
  • , Eun Jung Jun
  • , Sunwon Kim
  • , Bitna Kim
  • , Tae Hyun Kim
  • , Chang Bae Sohn
  • , Ae Young Her
  • , Yongwhi Park
  • , Jung Rae Cho
  • , Young Hoon Jeong
  • , Byung Joo Choi
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Data on drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment in the context of multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) are limited. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of DCB-based treatment on percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel CAD. Methods: A total of 254 patients with multivessel disease successfully treated with DCBs or in combination with drug-eluting stents (DES) were retrospectively enrolled (DCB-based group) and compared with 254 propensity-matched patients treated with second-generation DES from the PTRG-DES (Platelet Function and Genotype-Related Long-Term Prognosis in Drug-Eluting Stent-Treated Patients With Coronary Artery Disease) registry (n = 13,160) (DES-only group). Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) comprised cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, target vessel revascularization, and major bleeding at 2 years. Results: Baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between the groups. In the DCB-based group, 34.3% of patients were treated with DCBs only and 65.7% were treated with the DES hybrid approach. The number of stents and total stent length were significantly reduced by 65.4% and 63.7%, respectively, in the DCB-based group compared with the DES-only group. Moreover, the DCB-based group had a lower rate of MACE than the DES-only group (3.9% and 11.0%; P = 0.002) at 2-year follow-up. The DES-only group had a higher risk for cardiac death and major bleeding. Conclusions: The DCB-based treatment approach showed a significantly reduced stent burden for multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention and led to a lower rate of MACE than the DES-only treatment. This study shows that DCB-based treatment approach safely reduces stent burden in multivessel CAD, and improved long-term outcomes may be expected by reducing stent-related events.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)292-299
Number of pages8
JournalJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023 Feb 13
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation

Keywords

  • coronary artery disease
  • drug-coated balloon
  • drug-eluting stent(s)
  • multivessel
  • paclitaxel-coated balloon
  • percutaneous coronary intervention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical Impact of Drug-Coated Balloon–Based Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this