Abstract
This comment explains that the quantum signature scheme proposed by Ming-Xing Luo et al. (in Int. J. Theor. Phys. 51:2134, 2012) cannot satisfy the signature requirements. The comment presents methods of possible attacks by forgers, while also demonstrating that it is difficult to proceed by the normal protocol because of some errors in the formula of the scheme.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1862-1866 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | International Journal of Theoretical Physics |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 Jun |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This research was supported by the research foundation of Korea University.
Keywords
- Quantum communication
- Quantum cryptography
- Quantum signature
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Mathematics
- Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comment on "Quantum Signature Scheme with Weak Arbitrator"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS