Comparative study of three different catalyst coating methods for direct methanol fuel cells

Hyung Joo Choi, Jinsoo Kim, Yongchai Kwon, Jonghee Han

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)


The performance of direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs) with membrane-electrode assemblies (MEAs) made separately by three different catalyst coating methods, namely, air-spray, electro-spray and dual-mode spray, is evaluated. Platinum-ruthenium (PtRu) is incorporated as a catalyst for the anode. Several techniques (XRD, FE-SEM, and TEM) are used to examine whether the coating method affects the morphological features of the PtRu catalyst, whereas cyclic voltammetry is used to evaluate the active surface area. The cell polarization curves attained for the three coating methods that use different methanol concentrations are compared to determine the best method. It is found that the PtRu catalyst coated by the dual-mode spray shows the most uniform nanoparticle distribution and the highest active surface area. The DMFC performance is best when the dual-mode spray is employed (165 mW cm-2 at 2 M methanol).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)160-164
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Power Sources
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Jan 1


  • Air-spray
  • Direct methanol fuel cell
  • Dual-mode spray
  • Electro-spray

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering


Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative study of three different catalyst coating methods for direct methanol fuel cells'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this