Abstract
Photovoltaic (PV) installations have traditionally relied on a conventional south-facing orientation, which maximizes energy production at noon but has lower energy generation in the morning and afternoon. Vertical photovoltaic (VPV) systems have emerged as promising alternatives to address this inconsistency. Vertical photovoltaic systems can enhance energy generation by facing east in the morning and west in the afternoon. We compared the performance of n-tunnel oxide passivated contact (n-TOPCon) and p-passivated emitter and rear contact (p-PERC) cells in vertical photovoltaic systems to determine whether the optimal installation direction of bifacial vertical photovoltaics is east or west. Our findings indicated that n-TOPCon cells exhibited higher energy yields than p-PERC cells, with a difference of approximately 8%, attributed to the superior bifaciality and lower temperature coefficient of power of n-TOPCon. Additionally, the energy yield was higher for n-TOPCon modules when the front faced east, whereas the PERC modules performed better with a west-facing front. This contributes to the knowledge of the factors for energy production in vertical photovoltaic systems and the optimization of installation configurations.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 993-1001 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability |
Volume | 8 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2024 Sept |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2024.
Keywords
- Building integrated photovoltaics (BIPV)
- Korean climate
- Net zero energy building (NZEB) energy yield
- Rooftop
- Vertical photovoltaics
- n-TOPCon
- p-PERC
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Control and Systems Engineering
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- General Chemical Engineering
- Waste Management and Disposal
- Pollution
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law