TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of a new enzymatic assay for serum homocysteine on Toshiba TBA-c16000 against an immunoassay on Abbott Architect
AU - Kim, Ha Nui
AU - Yoon, Soo Young
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by a grant from the Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (H15C1512).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Homocysteine, a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, is commonly analyzed using enzymatic measurements and immunoassays. We compared the results of a new enzymatic assay with those of an immunoassay, using new reagents for homocysteine. The 87 serum samples were analyzed using the Abbott Architect i2000sr (immunoassay) and Toshiba TBA-c16000 (enzymatic assay), and the results obtained from the two assays were compared for precision, correlation, linearity, sample carryover, and reference range verification according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Repeatability and total imprecision were within the desirable range (Westgard QC, 4.15%). Correlation analysis revealed a strong correlation with a slope ranging from 0.9887 to 1.052, a correlation coefficient (R 2) of 0.9886 [95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.9899–0.9968], and a y-intercept from −0.5741 to 0.6252. Linearity was acceptable (R 2 = 0.9993), and the recovery rate was within ±10% of the expected value. The enzymatic assay showed an acceptable carryover rate (−0.15%) and a shorter turnaround time (10–12 min) compared with that of the immunoassay (30 min). Our new enzymatic assay for the measurement of homocysteine showed an acceptable performance in terms of precision, correlation, linearity, carryover test, cost-effectiveness, and speed.
AB - Homocysteine, a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, is commonly analyzed using enzymatic measurements and immunoassays. We compared the results of a new enzymatic assay with those of an immunoassay, using new reagents for homocysteine. The 87 serum samples were analyzed using the Abbott Architect i2000sr (immunoassay) and Toshiba TBA-c16000 (enzymatic assay), and the results obtained from the two assays were compared for precision, correlation, linearity, sample carryover, and reference range verification according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Repeatability and total imprecision were within the desirable range (Westgard QC, 4.15%). Correlation analysis revealed a strong correlation with a slope ranging from 0.9887 to 1.052, a correlation coefficient (R 2) of 0.9886 [95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.9899–0.9968], and a y-intercept from −0.5741 to 0.6252. Linearity was acceptable (R 2 = 0.9993), and the recovery rate was within ±10% of the expected value. The enzymatic assay showed an acceptable carryover rate (−0.15%) and a shorter turnaround time (10–12 min) compared with that of the immunoassay (30 min). Our new enzymatic assay for the measurement of homocysteine showed an acceptable performance in terms of precision, correlation, linearity, carryover test, cost-effectiveness, and speed.
KW - Homocysteine
KW - enzymatic assay
KW - immunoassay
KW - method comparison
KW - spectrophotometric
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098539662&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00365513.2020.1852597
DO - 10.1080/00365513.2020.1852597
M3 - Article
C2 - 33356622
AN - SCOPUS:85098539662
SN - 0036-5513
VL - 81
SP - 46
EP - 51
JO - Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation
JF - Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation
IS - 1
ER -