Comparison of effective thermal conductivity in closed-loop vertical ground heat exchangers

Chulho Lee, Moonseo Park, Sunhong Min, Shin Hyung Kang, Byonghu Sohn, Hangseok Choi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Performing a series of in-situ thermal response tests, the effective thermal conductivity of six vertical closed-loop ground heat exchangers was experimentally evaluated and compared to each other, which were constructed in a test bed in Wonju, South Korea. To compare thermal efficiency of the ground heat exchangers in field, the six boreholes were constructed with different construction conditions: i.e., different grouting materials (cement vs. bentonite), different shape of heat exchange pipe-sections (conventional U-loop type vs. new 3 pipe-type), and different additives (silica sand vs. graphite). One observation borehole was installed in the middle of the test site to measure a subsurface temperature change during performing the in-situ thermal response test. From the test results, it can be shown that cement grouting has a higher effective thermal conductivity than that of bentonite grouting, and graphite better performs over silica sand as a thermally enhancing addictive. In addition, a new 3 pipe-type heat exchanger yields less thermal interference between the inlet and outlet pipe than the conventional U-loop type heat exchanger, which results in superior thermal performance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3669-3676
Number of pages8
JournalApplied Thermal Engineering
Volume31
Issue number17-18
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Dec

Keywords

  • Ground heat exchanger
  • In-situ thermal response test
  • Thermal conductivity
  • Thermal interference

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of effective thermal conductivity in closed-loop vertical ground heat exchangers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this