Comparison of four composite landfill liner systems considering leakage rate and mass flux

T. B. Nguyen, T. D. Stark, H. Choi

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

    8 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Performance of four different municipal solid waste landfill liner systems, i.e., Subtitle D composite liner system, composite liner system with a geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) instead of low permeability compacted soil, Wisconsin NR500 liner system, and proposed four-component composite liner system that is a combination of the GCL composite liner system and the Subtitle D liner (with a 61 cm (2 feet) or 91.5 cm (3 feet) thick compacted clay liner), were evaluated in terms of leakage rate and mass flux. The leakage rate through circular and non-circular geomembrane (GM) defects was analyzed using both analytical and numerical methods. For the mass flux evaluation, solute transport analyses using GM defects and diffusion of volatile organic compounds through intact liners were conducted using one- and three-dimensional numerical models. Cadmium and toluene were used as typical inorganic and organic substances, respectively, in the analyses. The comparison shows that the proposed four-component composite liner system outperforms the other liner systems based on leakage rate and mass flux and is a viable choice for a liner system.

    Original languageEnglish
    Publication statusPublished - 2011
    Event14th Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, ARC 2011 - Hong Kong, China
    Duration: 2011 May 232011 May 27

    Other

    Other14th Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, ARC 2011
    Country/TerritoryChina
    CityHong Kong
    Period11/5/2311/5/27

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Soil Science
    • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of four composite landfill liner systems considering leakage rate and mass flux'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this