Comparison of the qualitative and the quantitative risk assessment of hazardous substances requiring management under the occupational safety and health act in South Korea

Hyung Il Moon, Sang Woo Han, Saemi Shin, Sang Hoon Byeon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The risk assessment of hazardous substances has become increasingly important for the efficient prevention and management of various diseases or accidents caused by increased amounts of hazardous substances in the workplace. In this study, risk assessment was conducted for 36 kinds of hazardous substances requiring management by using qualitative and quantitative risk assessments. Qualitative risk assessment was performed by multiplying the exposure level class by the hazard class according to the Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency’s (KO-SHA) Chemical Hazard Risk Management (CHARM). The quantitative risk assessment was fol-lowed by a four-step risk assessment system presented in the Guidelines for Hazard Risk Assessment of Chemicals (KOSHA GUIDE W-6-2016). In the quantitative assessments, we presented a new method of classifying risk levels into four steps, much like qualitative assessments. In this study, the quantitative risk assessment was considered difficult to predict through qualitative risk assessment. Therefore, it is necessary to perform a quantitative risk assessment after a qualitative risk assessment for a higher level of risk assessment.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1354
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalInternational journal of environmental research and public health
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021 Feb 1

Keywords

  • Control banding
  • Hazardous substances requiring management
  • Occupational safety and health act
  • Qualitative risk assessment
  • Quantitative risk assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of the qualitative and the quantitative risk assessment of hazardous substances requiring management under the occupational safety and health act in South Korea'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this