Comparison of the vitek 2, microscan, and etest methods with the agar dilution method in assessing colistin susceptibility of bloodstream isolates of Acinetobacter species from a Korean University Hospital

  • Seung Yeob Lee
  • , Jong Hee Shin
  • , Kyungwon Lee
  • , Min Young Joo
  • , Kyung Hwa Park
  • , Myung Geun Shin
  • , Soon Pal Suh
  • , Dong Wook Ryang
  • , Soo Hyun Kim*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We evaluated three commercial colistin susceptibility testing methods using 213 bloodstream Acinetobacter isolates identified by gene sequencing. Compared to the agar dilution reference method, excellent categorical agreements (both 99.1%) were observed using Vitek 2 and Etest, compared to 87.3% (95.7% for Acinetobacter baumannii and 80.7% for non-baumannii Acinetobacter isolates) using MicroScan.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1924-1926
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Clinical Microbiology
Volume51
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Jun
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Microbiology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of the vitek 2, microscan, and etest methods with the agar dilution method in assessing colistin susceptibility of bloodstream isolates of Acinetobacter species from a Korean University Hospital'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this