Continuous glucose monitoring with structured education in adults with type 2 diabetes managed by multiple daily insulin injections: a multicentre randomised controlled trial

  • Ji Yoon Kim
  • , Sang Man Jin
  • , Kang Hee Sim
  • , Bo Yeon Kim
  • , Jae Hyoung Cho
  • , Jun Sung Moon
  • , Soo Lim
  • , Eun Seok Kang
  • , Cheol Young Park
  • , Sin Gon Kim
  • , Jae Hyeon Kim*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of stand-alone intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) with or without a structured education programme and blood glucose monitoring (BGM) in adults with type 2 diabetes on multiple daily insulin injections (MDI). Methods: In this 24 week randomised open-label multicentre trial, adults with type 2 diabetes on intensive insulin therapy with HbA1c levels of 58–108 mmol/mol (7.5–12.0%) were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to isCGM with a structured education programme on adjusting insulin dose and timing according to graphical patterns in CGM (intervention group), isCGM with conventional education (control group 1) or BGM with conventional education (control group 2). Block randomisation was conducted by an independent statistician. Due to the nature of the intervention, blinding of participants and investigators was not possible. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c from baseline at 24 weeks, assessed using ANCOVA with the baseline value as a covariate. Results: A total of 159 individuals were randomised (n=53 for each group); 148 were included in the full analysis set, with 52 in the intervention group, 49 in control group 1 and 47 in control group 2. The mean (± SD) HbA1c level at baseline was 68.19±10.94 mmol/mol (8.39±1.00%). The least squares mean change (± SEM) from baseline HbA1c at 24 weeks was −10.96±1.35 mmol/mol (−1.00±0.12%) in the intervention group, −6.87±1.39 mmol/mol (−0.63±0.13%) in control group 1 (p=0.0367 vs intervention group) and −6.32±1.42 mmol/mol (−0.58±0.13%) in control group 2 (p=0.0193 vs intervention group). Adverse events occurred in 28.85% (15/52) of individuals in the intervention group, 26.42% (14/53) in control group 1 and 48.08% (25/52) in control group 2. Conclusions/interpretation: Stand-alone isCGM offers a greater reduction in HbA1c in adults with type 2 diabetes on MDI when education on the interpretation of graphical patterns in CGM is provided. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04926623. Funding: This study was supported by Daewoong Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Graphical Abstract: (Figure presented.)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1223-1234
Number of pages12
JournalDiabetologia
Volume67
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024 Jul

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Continuous glucose monitoring
  • Diabetes education
  • Flash sensor glucose technology
  • Insulin
  • Type 2 diabetes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Continuous glucose monitoring with structured education in adults with type 2 diabetes managed by multiple daily insulin injections: a multicentre randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this