Continuous subjective rating of perceived motion incongruence during driving simulation

Diane Cleij, Joost Venrooij, Paolo Pretto, Daan M. Pool, Max Mulder, Heinrich H. Bülthoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)


Motion cueing algorithms are used in motion simulation to map the inertial vehicle motion onto the limited simulator motion space. This mapping causes mismatches between the unrestricted visual motion and the constrained inertial motion, which results in perceived motion incongruence (PMI). It is still largely unknown what exactly causes visual and inertial motion in a simulator to be perceived as incongruent. Current methods for measuring motion incongruence during motion simulation result in time-invariant measures of the overall incongruence, which makes it difficult to determine the relevance of the individual and short-duration mismatches between visual and inertial motion cues. In this paper, a novel method is presented to subjectively measure the time-varying PMI continuously throughout a simulation. The method is analyzed for reliability and validity of its measurements, as well as for its applicability in relating physical short-duration cueing errors to PMI. The analysis shows that the method is reliable and that the results can be used to obtain a deeper insight into the formation of motion incongruence during driving simulation.

Original languageEnglish
Article number8047440
Pages (from-to)17-29
Number of pages13
JournalIEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Feb


  • Cueing
  • Human factors
  • Perception
  • Simulation
  • Simulator validation
  • Virtual reality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Signal Processing
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Artificial Intelligence


Dive into the research topics of 'Continuous subjective rating of perceived motion incongruence during driving simulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this