TY - JOUR
T1 - Correlation analysis of road load fuel economy variations by energy difference for gasoline direct injection and diesel-powered vehicles
AU - Son, Jeonghun
AU - Ko, Jinyoung
AU - Kim, Kangjin
AU - Myung, Cha Lee
AU - Park, Simsoo
AU - Kim, Charyung
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge the Hyundai Motor Company for technical assistance with the GDI and diesel vehicles. The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was supported by the BK21 Plus program (21A20131712520) via the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education of Korea and the Korea University Grant. This study was also funded by the 2014 R&D Project for Land and Transportation Technologies under the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transportation.
Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was supported by the BK21 Plus program (21A20131712520) via the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education of Korea and the Korea University Grant. This study was also funded by the 2014 R&D Project for Land and Transportation Technologies under the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transportation.
Publisher Copyright:
© IMechE 2020.
PY - 2020/2/1
Y1 - 2020/2/1
N2 - Test flexibilities, such as the tire pressure, adjustment of brakes, vehicle preconditioning, test mass, and running-in period, are multiple factors that can confound vehicle emissions and fuel economy tests. The road load force is the most influential flexibility factor for a type-approval vehicle certification test. Because of these various factors, it was revealed that there was a substantial difference between the type-approval emissions and those from a real-driving emissions test. In this study, the test cycle road load energy using the road load coefficients determined by the TA coast-down procedure was the base condition. After calculating the test cycle road load power, the constant term of the road load coefficient was adjusted by the energy loss. The tolerance of the road load in domestic regulation is 15%, so the constant term of the road load coefficient was increased by 5% in the cycle road load energy loss. Then, the road load power and tractive power were calculated from the force and vehicle speed. The vehicle fuel efficiency, under the road load variation conditions, was determined for modern 2.4 L gasoline direct injection and lean NOx trap-equipped diesel vehicles on a chassis dynamometer. To assess the impact of different road load values on the FE and carbon dioxide emissions, the test cycle was performed over the combined modes of the federal test procedure-75 and the highway fuel economy test. To investigate the road load variations of the vehicle fuel economy in correlation with the energy difference, the statistical approach of the one-way analysis of variance was applied. The results showed that the variations of the road load energy of the tested cycle were closely related in a trade-off relationship with the vehicle fuel economy.
AB - Test flexibilities, such as the tire pressure, adjustment of brakes, vehicle preconditioning, test mass, and running-in period, are multiple factors that can confound vehicle emissions and fuel economy tests. The road load force is the most influential flexibility factor for a type-approval vehicle certification test. Because of these various factors, it was revealed that there was a substantial difference between the type-approval emissions and those from a real-driving emissions test. In this study, the test cycle road load energy using the road load coefficients determined by the TA coast-down procedure was the base condition. After calculating the test cycle road load power, the constant term of the road load coefficient was adjusted by the energy loss. The tolerance of the road load in domestic regulation is 15%, so the constant term of the road load coefficient was increased by 5% in the cycle road load energy loss. Then, the road load power and tractive power were calculated from the force and vehicle speed. The vehicle fuel efficiency, under the road load variation conditions, was determined for modern 2.4 L gasoline direct injection and lean NOx trap-equipped diesel vehicles on a chassis dynamometer. To assess the impact of different road load values on the FE and carbon dioxide emissions, the test cycle was performed over the combined modes of the federal test procedure-75 and the highway fuel economy test. To investigate the road load variations of the vehicle fuel economy in correlation with the energy difference, the statistical approach of the one-way analysis of variance was applied. The results showed that the variations of the road load energy of the tested cycle were closely related in a trade-off relationship with the vehicle fuel economy.
KW - Road load
KW - flexibility
KW - fuel economy
KW - one-way analysis of variance
KW - type-approval
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078135308&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0954407019899516
DO - 10.1177/0954407019899516
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85078135308
SN - 0954-4070
VL - 234
SP - 897
EP - 911
JO - Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering
JF - Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering
IS - 2-3
ER -