TY - JOUR
T1 - CO2 absorption mechanism in aqueous ternary solutions of alkanolamines
T2 - Experimental and thermodynamic modeling approaches
AU - Kim, Seung Mo
AU - Kim, Kyung Min
AU - Choi, Bong Keun
AU - Mun, Ji Hun
AU - Shin, Beom Ju
AU - Lee, Ugwiyeon
AU - Shin, Chae Ho
AU - Choi, Jungkyu
AU - Min, Byoung Moo
AU - Lee, Ung
AU - Moon, Jong Ho
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (Nos. 2020M3H7A1098273 & 2020R1A2C1014662 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/1/15
Y1 - 2022/1/15
N2 - The absorption mechanism of CO2 in an aqueous solution containing three alkanolamines was analyzed experimentally and theoretically. The vapor–liquid equilibrium of a CO2–monoethanolamine (MEA)–diisopropanolamine (DIPA)–2-amino-2-methyl-propanol (AMP)–H2O system was evaluated experimentally over a wide temperature range (323.15–393.15 K) at several MEA:DIPA:AMP:H2O blending ratios (15:10:5:70, 10:10:10:70, 7.5:7.5:15:70, and 5:15:10:70 wt%). The successive substitution method was used to calculate the concentrations of five molecules (CO2, MEA, DIPA, AMP, and H2O) and nine electrolytes (four cations and five anions) in the liquid phase by solving eight equilibrium equations, four mass balance equations, and one charge balance equation. The Deshmukh–Mather model, which is based on an activity coefficient approach, and the fugacity coefficient model were used to evaluate the nonideality of the liquid and vapor phases, respectively. Thereafter, the effect of the MEA:DIPA:AMP blending ratio was evaluated using the triangular diagrams of the carbamate, bicarbonate and carbonate molar fractions in liquid phase, CO2 loading ratio, CO2 cyclic capacity, and heat of CO2 absorption.
AB - The absorption mechanism of CO2 in an aqueous solution containing three alkanolamines was analyzed experimentally and theoretically. The vapor–liquid equilibrium of a CO2–monoethanolamine (MEA)–diisopropanolamine (DIPA)–2-amino-2-methyl-propanol (AMP)–H2O system was evaluated experimentally over a wide temperature range (323.15–393.15 K) at several MEA:DIPA:AMP:H2O blending ratios (15:10:5:70, 10:10:10:70, 7.5:7.5:15:70, and 5:15:10:70 wt%). The successive substitution method was used to calculate the concentrations of five molecules (CO2, MEA, DIPA, AMP, and H2O) and nine electrolytes (four cations and five anions) in the liquid phase by solving eight equilibrium equations, four mass balance equations, and one charge balance equation. The Deshmukh–Mather model, which is based on an activity coefficient approach, and the fugacity coefficient model were used to evaluate the nonideality of the liquid and vapor phases, respectively. Thereafter, the effect of the MEA:DIPA:AMP blending ratio was evaluated using the triangular diagrams of the carbamate, bicarbonate and carbonate molar fractions in liquid phase, CO2 loading ratio, CO2 cyclic capacity, and heat of CO2 absorption.
KW - 2-amino-2-methyl-propanol (AMP)
KW - Deshmukh–Mather model
KW - Diisopropanolamine (DIPA)
KW - MDA (MEA–DIPA–AMP)
KW - Monoethanolamine (MEA)
KW - Three-component alkanolamine solution
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85114175798&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cej.2021.132044
DO - 10.1016/j.cej.2021.132044
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85114175798
SN - 1385-8947
VL - 428
JO - Chemical Engineering Journal
JF - Chemical Engineering Journal
M1 - 132044
ER -