Decoding foveal word recognition: the role of interhemispheric inhibition in bilateral hemispheric processing

  • Sangyub Kim
  • , Kichun Nam*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Extant research has largely favored the Split Fovea Theory (SFT) over the Bilateral Projection Theory (BPT) in the context of foveal word recognition. SFT posits that during foveal fixation, letters in the left and right visual fields are projected to their respective contralateral hemispheres, thereby facilitating a division of labor across the bilateral hemispheres. This division may serve as a regulatory mechanism to mitigate redundant processing in both hemispheres. The present investigation conducted two experiments utilizing Korean visual words to explore whether this hemispheric division in foveal word recognition is a strategy to circumvent potential interhemispheric inhibition arising from duplicated processing. Experiment 1 established the suitability of Korean visual words for studies involving both unilateral and bilateral presentations. Experiment 2 revealed that the split presentation of a word elicited greater accuracy compared to its identical presentation in the bilateral visual fields. These findings lend credence to the notion that interhemispheric inhibition may drive the hemispheres to engage in divided labor, thereby reducing processing redundancy in foveal word recognition.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1293529
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 Kim and Nam.

Keywords

  • bilateral projection theory
  • foveal word recognition
  • hemispheric coordination
  • interhemispheric inhibition
  • split fovea theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Decoding foveal word recognition: the role of interhemispheric inhibition in bilateral hemispheric processing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this