Diagnosis of acute cholecystitis: Value of contrast agent in the gallbladder and cystic duct on Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MR cholangiography

In Young Choi; Sang Hoon Cha; Suk Keu Yeom; Seung Hwa Lee; Hwan Hoon Chung; Bo Kyung Je; Bo Kyong Seo; Ki Yeol Lee

doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2013.09.006

Diagnosis of acute cholecystitis: Value of contrast agent in the gallbladder and cystic duct on Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MR cholangiography

In Young Choi
, Sang Hoon Cha^*
, Suk Keu Yeom
, Seung Hwa Lee
, Hwan Hoon Chung
, Bo Kyung Je
, Bo Kyong Seo
, Ki Yeol Lee

^*Corresponding author for this work

Department of Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To evaluate value of %volume of contrast agent in gallbladder and contrast in cystic duct in diagnosis of acute cholecysititis with Gd-EOB-DTPA MRC obtained 60 min after contrast injection (T1-MRC60min). We included 16 acute cholecystitis (AC), 23 chronic cholecystitis (CC), and 40 healthy volunteers. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed cutoff value of 30.5% as predictor of AC comparing with healthy volunteers (sensitivity 93.8%, specificity 100%, AUC 0.958) and cutoff of 0% as predictor of AC comparing CC (sensitivity 81.2%, specificity 82.6%, AUC 0.823). In AC absent or obliterated cystic duct on T1-MRC60min showed 81.3%, 100%, sensitivity and specificity, respectively. These can be helpful for diagnosis of AC.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	174-178
Number of pages	5
Journal	Clinical Imaging
Volume	38
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2013.09.006
Publication status	Published - 2014 Mar

Keywords

Bile duct
Cholecystitis
Contrast agent
Magnetic resonance imaging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Access to Document

10.1016/j.clinimag.2013.09.006

Cite this

@article{c4969a2216de4632b3fd6fb3202ae035,

title = "Diagnosis of acute cholecystitis: Value of contrast agent in the gallbladder and cystic duct on Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MR cholangiography",

abstract = "To evaluate value of \%volume of contrast agent in gallbladder and contrast in cystic duct in diagnosis of acute cholecysititis with Gd-EOB-DTPA MRC obtained 60 min after contrast injection (T1-MRC60min). We included 16 acute cholecystitis (AC), 23 chronic cholecystitis (CC), and 40 healthy volunteers. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed cutoff value of 30.5\% as predictor of AC comparing with healthy volunteers (sensitivity 93.8\%, specificity 100\%, AUC 0.958) and cutoff of 0\% as predictor of AC comparing CC (sensitivity 81.2\%, specificity 82.6\%, AUC 0.823). In AC absent or obliterated cystic duct on T1-MRC60min showed 81.3\%, 100\%, sensitivity and specificity, respectively. These can be helpful for diagnosis of AC.",

keywords = "Bile duct, Cholecystitis, Contrast agent, Magnetic resonance imaging",

author = "Choi, \{In Young\} and Cha, \{Sang Hoon\} and Yeom, \{Suk Keu\} and Lee, \{Seung Hwa\} and Chung, \{Hwan Hoon\} and Je, \{Bo Kyung\} and \{Kyong Seo\}, Bo and Lee, \{Ki Yeol\}",

year = "2014",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1016/j.clinimag.2013.09.006",

language = "English",

volume = "38",

pages = "174--178",

journal = "Clinical Imaging",

issn = "0899-7071",

publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnosis of acute cholecystitis

T2 - Value of contrast agent in the gallbladder and cystic duct on Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MR cholangiography

AU - Choi, In Young

AU - Cha, Sang Hoon

AU - Yeom, Suk Keu

AU - Lee, Seung Hwa

AU - Chung, Hwan Hoon

AU - Je, Bo Kyung

AU - Kyong Seo, Bo

AU - Lee, Ki Yeol

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - To evaluate value of %volume of contrast agent in gallbladder and contrast in cystic duct in diagnosis of acute cholecysititis with Gd-EOB-DTPA MRC obtained 60 min after contrast injection (T1-MRC60min). We included 16 acute cholecystitis (AC), 23 chronic cholecystitis (CC), and 40 healthy volunteers. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed cutoff value of 30.5% as predictor of AC comparing with healthy volunteers (sensitivity 93.8%, specificity 100%, AUC 0.958) and cutoff of 0% as predictor of AC comparing CC (sensitivity 81.2%, specificity 82.6%, AUC 0.823). In AC absent or obliterated cystic duct on T1-MRC60min showed 81.3%, 100%, sensitivity and specificity, respectively. These can be helpful for diagnosis of AC.

AB - To evaluate value of %volume of contrast agent in gallbladder and contrast in cystic duct in diagnosis of acute cholecysititis with Gd-EOB-DTPA MRC obtained 60 min after contrast injection (T1-MRC60min). We included 16 acute cholecystitis (AC), 23 chronic cholecystitis (CC), and 40 healthy volunteers. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed cutoff value of 30.5% as predictor of AC comparing with healthy volunteers (sensitivity 93.8%, specificity 100%, AUC 0.958) and cutoff of 0% as predictor of AC comparing CC (sensitivity 81.2%, specificity 82.6%, AUC 0.823). In AC absent or obliterated cystic duct on T1-MRC60min showed 81.3%, 100%, sensitivity and specificity, respectively. These can be helpful for diagnosis of AC.

KW - Bile duct

KW - Cholecystitis

KW - Contrast agent

KW - Magnetic resonance imaging

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84895790469

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2013.09.006

DO - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2013.09.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 24359644

AN - SCOPUS:84895790469

SN - 0899-7071

VL - 38

SP - 174

EP - 178

JO - Clinical Imaging

JF - Clinical Imaging

IS - 2

ER -

Diagnosis of acute cholecystitis: Value of contrast agent in the gallbladder and cystic duct on Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MR cholangiography

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this