Differential impact of cilostazol on restenosis according to implanted stent type (from a Pooled Analysis of Three DECLARE Randomized Trials)

  • Seung Whan Lee
  • , Jung Min Ahn
  • , Seungbong Han
  • , Gyung Min Park
  • , Young Rak Cho
  • , Woo Seok Lee
  • , Jeong Yoon Jang
  • , Chang Hee Kwon
  • , Jong Young Lee
  • , Won Jang Kim
  • , Soo Jin Kang
  • , Young Hak Kim
  • , Cheol Whan Lee
  • , Jae Joong Kim
  • , Seong Wook Park
  • , Seung Jung Park*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Even in the drug-eluting stent era, restenosis has remained an unresolved issue, particularly in the treatment of complex coronary lesions. In this study, patient-level data from 3 randomized trials (Drug-Eluting Stenting Followed by Cilostazol Treatment Reduces Late Restenosis in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus [DECLARE-DIABETES] and Drug-Eluting Stenting Followed by Cilostazol Treatment Reduces Late Restenosis in Patients With Long Native Coronary Lesions [DECLARE-LONG] I and II) were pooled to estimate the differential antirestenotic efficacy of add-on cilostazol according to the implanted drug-eluting stent in patients at high risk for restenosis. A total of 1,399 patients underwent sirolimus-eluting stent (SES; n = 450), paclitaxel-eluting stent (n = 450), and zotarolimus-eluting stent (n = 499) implantation and received triple-antiplatelet therapy (TAT; aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol, n = 700) and dual-antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and clopidogrel, n = 699). Randomization of antiplatelet regimen was stratified by stent type. In-stent late loss after TAT was significantly lower than that after dual-antiplatelet therapy, regardless of implanted stent type. However, the incidence of in-segment restenosis after TAT was significantly lower with SES (0.5% vs 6.7%, p = 0.014) and zotarolimus-eluting stent (12.2% vs 20.0%, p = 0.028) implantation but not paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation (14.4% vs 20.0%, p = 0.244). A significant interaction was present between stent type and antiplatelet regimen for the risk for in-segment restenosis (p = 0.004). Post hoc analysis using bootstrap resampling methods showed that the relative risk reduction for in-segment restenosis after TAT was most prominent with SES implantation. In conclusion, add-on cilostazol effectively reduced restenosis in patients at high risk for restenosis, particularly in those receiving SES, suggesting the sustainable utility of add-on cilostazol therapy in newer generation drug-eluting stents with comparable efficacy with that of SES.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1328-1334
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Cardiology
Volume112
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Nov 1
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differential impact of cilostazol on restenosis according to implanted stent type (from a Pooled Analysis of Three DECLARE Randomized Trials)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this