Distribution and Diversity of Ocular Microbial Communities in Diabetic Patients Compared with Healthy Subjects

Baknoon Ham, Hyung Bin Hwang, Sang Hoon Jung, Sungyul Chang, Kui Dong Kang, Man Jae Kwon

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    55 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify differences in the major (core vs. variable) microbial genera of human subjects with and without diabetes. Methods: Bacterial 16S rRNA genes obtained from conjunctival swabs of 19 healthy subjects and 30 diabetic patients were sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform, and the sequencing data were analyzed using QIIME 1.9.1. To elucidate the microbial diversity in the ocular surface (OS), test programs from various bioinformatics domains were used. Results: Diversity index and rarefaction analysis showed that the microbial community of the diabetic patients was more diverse than that of the healthy subjects. Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Cyanobacteria and Bacteroidetes were the dominant taxa present in the OS, and there was a significant difference in the relative abundance of the bacterial phyla between the diabetic patients and control subjects. Proteobacteria were more abundant in the diabetic group, whereas Firmicutes was more abundant in the control group. Analysis of bacterial taxa at the genus level showed that the core microbiome of diabetic patients comprised Acinetobacter, Burkholderia, Sphingomonas, and Ralstonia, whereas that of the controls comprised Bradyrhizobiaceae, Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium, Pseudomonas, Novosphingobium, Neisseriaceae, and Acinetobacter. Conclusions: There was a significant difference in the microbial community composition between diabetic patients and healthy subjects. A high abundance of Acinetobacter in the OS of diabetic patients may arise from the unique characteristics of the OS compared with those of other organ surfaces.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)314-324
    Number of pages11
    JournalCurrent Eye Research
    Volume43
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2018 Mar 4

    Bibliographical note

    Funding Information:
    Author B.N.H is supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (MEST) (2016, University-Institute cooperation program). This work was supported by KIST – Gangneung Institute (Grant no. 2Z04930), as well as by the grant of translational R&D Project through Institute for Bio-Medical convergence, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea.

    Funding Information:
    Author B.N.H is supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (MEST) (2016, University-Institute cooperation program). This work was supported by KIST–Gangneung Institute (Grant no. 2Z04930), as well as by the grant of translational R&D Project through Institute for Bio-Medical convergence, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea. We thank Dr. Dion Antonopoulos and Mr. Jason Koval from Argonne National Laboratory, USA, for sequencing the samples. The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper. Author B.N.H is supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (MEST) (2016, University-Institute cooperation program). This work was supported by KIST–Gangneung Institute (Grant no. 2Z04930), as well as by the grant of translational R&D Project through Institute for Bio-Medical convergence, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea.

    Publisher Copyright:
    © 2017 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

    Keywords

    • Bacterial diversity
    • Bradyrhizobiaceae
    • Burkholderia
    • LFR analysis
    • Staphylococcus

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Ophthalmology
    • Sensory Systems
    • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Distribution and Diversity of Ocular Microbial Communities in Diabetic Patients Compared with Healthy Subjects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this