TY - JOUR
T1 - Economic burdens and quality of life of family caregivers of cancer patients
AU - Young, Ho Yun
AU - Young, Sun Rhee
AU - Im, Ok Kang
AU - Jung, Suk Lee
AU - Soo, Mee Bang
AU - Won, Sup Lee
AU - Jun, Suk Kim
AU - Si, Young Kim
AU - Sang, Won Shin
AU - Young, Seon Hong
PY - 2005/7
Y1 - 2005/7
N2 - Objectives: We conducted this study to identify factors influencing the burdens cancer brings to a patient's family and to evaluate the association between the burdens and the caregiver's quality of life (QOL). Methods: Participants were drawn from the primary family caregivers of cancer patients at 6 university hospitals and the National Cancer Center in Korea. Of the 738 eligible caregivers, 704 (95.4%) completed the questionnaire packets (Family Impact Questions and Caregiver's QOL-Cancer). Results: Caregivers, who were poor (OR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.44-3.10), whose health status was poor (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.29-2.70), who were married (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.12-2.72), who provided care for a long time (OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.59-3.28), who cared for patients with poor performance status (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.00-1.82), and who paid high medical expenses (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.21-2.40), were more likely to lose their family savings. In multiple regression analysis, most burden variables - including requiring caregiving assistance, major life change, inability to function normally, loss of savings, loss of income, and altered educational plans - were associated with caregiver QOL. Loss of family income, which was related to economic issues, was most strongly associated with it (16.0%). Conclusions: Our study suggests that to improve caregiver QOL, we should give priority to decreasing the economic burden that cancer places on patient's family.
AB - Objectives: We conducted this study to identify factors influencing the burdens cancer brings to a patient's family and to evaluate the association between the burdens and the caregiver's quality of life (QOL). Methods: Participants were drawn from the primary family caregivers of cancer patients at 6 university hospitals and the National Cancer Center in Korea. Of the 738 eligible caregivers, 704 (95.4%) completed the questionnaire packets (Family Impact Questions and Caregiver's QOL-Cancer). Results: Caregivers, who were poor (OR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.44-3.10), whose health status was poor (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.29-2.70), who were married (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.12-2.72), who provided care for a long time (OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.59-3.28), who cared for patients with poor performance status (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.00-1.82), and who paid high medical expenses (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.21-2.40), were more likely to lose their family savings. In multiple regression analysis, most burden variables - including requiring caregiving assistance, major life change, inability to function normally, loss of savings, loss of income, and altered educational plans - were associated with caregiver QOL. Loss of family income, which was related to economic issues, was most strongly associated with it (16.0%). Conclusions: Our study suggests that to improve caregiver QOL, we should give priority to decreasing the economic burden that cancer places on patient's family.
KW - Burden
KW - Cancer
KW - Family caregiver
KW - Quality of life
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23844507947&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1159/000085703
DO - 10.1159/000085703
M3 - Article
C2 - 15886502
AN - SCOPUS:23844507947
SN - 0030-2414
VL - 68
SP - 107
EP - 114
JO - ONCOLOGY
JF - ONCOLOGY
IS - 2-3
ER -