TY - JOUR
T1 - Effectiveness of Silver-enhanced In Situ Hybridization for Evaluating HER2 Gene Status in Invasive Breast Carcinoma
T2 - A Comparative Study
AU - Lee, Youngseok
AU - Ryu, Youngjoon
AU - Jeong, Hoiseon
AU - Chang, Hyeyoon
AU - Kim, Younghye
AU - Kim, Aeree
PY - 2012/2
Y1 - 2012/2
N2 - Background and Aims: HER2 gene amplification occurs in breast cancers and has implications for treatment and prognosis. Recently, a new direct evaluation technique, silver enhanced in situ hybridization (SISH) was developed for evaluating HER2 gene status. This study was performed to evaluate the SISH technique for clinical use by comparing it to that of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Methods: We studied 543 cases of excised breast specimens diagnosed as invasive ductal carcinoma by IHC, FISH, and SISH using a tissue microarray. IHC, FISH, and SISH results were interpreted according to the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines. A total of seven English studies that reported the concordance rates of SISH and BDISH compared to FISH published before July 2011 were retrieved. Results: The consensus concordance rate between SISH and FISH was 96.69% (kappa value = 0.9175). The pooled sensitivity was 0.94 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.91-0.97], and the pooled specificity was 0.98 (95% CI = 0.96-099) in a meta-analysis of the retrieved studies and this study. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.9906. Conclusions: SISH technique is an effective modality and is comparable with FISH for evaluating HER2 gene amplification in patients with breast carcinoma.
AB - Background and Aims: HER2 gene amplification occurs in breast cancers and has implications for treatment and prognosis. Recently, a new direct evaluation technique, silver enhanced in situ hybridization (SISH) was developed for evaluating HER2 gene status. This study was performed to evaluate the SISH technique for clinical use by comparing it to that of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Methods: We studied 543 cases of excised breast specimens diagnosed as invasive ductal carcinoma by IHC, FISH, and SISH using a tissue microarray. IHC, FISH, and SISH results were interpreted according to the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines. A total of seven English studies that reported the concordance rates of SISH and BDISH compared to FISH published before July 2011 were retrieved. Results: The consensus concordance rate between SISH and FISH was 96.69% (kappa value = 0.9175). The pooled sensitivity was 0.94 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.91-0.97], and the pooled specificity was 0.98 (95% CI = 0.96-099) in a meta-analysis of the retrieved studies and this study. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.9906. Conclusions: SISH technique is an effective modality and is comparable with FISH for evaluating HER2 gene amplification in patients with breast carcinoma.
KW - ErbB-2
KW - Fluorescence in situ hybridization
KW - HER2
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - Silver in situ hybridization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860615525&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.arcmed.2012.03.010
DO - 10.1016/j.arcmed.2012.03.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 22475781
AN - SCOPUS:84860615525
SN - 0188-4409
VL - 43
SP - 139
EP - 144
JO - Archives of Medical Research
JF - Archives of Medical Research
IS - 2
ER -