Exploratory subgroup analysis of patients with prior trastuzumab use in the ATTRACTION-2 trial: a randomized phase III clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer

  • Taroh Satoh
  • , Yoon Koo Kang
  • , Yee Chao
  • , Min Hee Ryu
  • , Ken Kato
  • , Hyun Cheol Chung
  • , Jen Shi Chen
  • , Kei Muro
  • , Won Ki Kang
  • , Kun Huei Yeh
  • , Takaki Yoshikawa
  • , Sang Cheul Oh
  • , Li Yuan Bai
  • , Takao Tamura
  • , Keun Wook Lee
  • , Yasuo Hamamoto
  • , Jong Gwang Kim
  • , Keisho Chin
  • , Do Youn Oh
  • , Keiko Minashi
  • Jae Yong Cho, Masahiro Tsuda, Mitsunobu Tanimoto, Li Tzong Chen, Narikazu Boku*
*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Background: Data on immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer are lacking. Because HER2 status was not captured in the ATTRACTION-2 trial, we used patients with prior trastuzumab use (Tmab+) as surrogate for HER2 expression status to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab as third- or later-line therapy in these patients. Methods: In ATTRACTION-2, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 multicenter trial, patients were randomized (2:1) to receive nivolumab (3 mg/kg) or placebo every 2 weeks until disease progression or toxicity requiring study discontinuation. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety were assessed. Results: Of 493 enrolled patients, 81 (nivolumab, n = 59; placebo, n = 22) were Tmab+ and 412 (nivolumab, n = 271; placebo, n = 141) were Tmab−. In both groups, patients receiving nivolumab showed a longer median OS vs placebo (Tmab+, 8.3 [95% confidence interval, 5.3–12.9] vs 3.1 [1.9–5.3] months, hazard ratio, 0.38 [0.22–0.66]; P = 0.0006; Tmab−, 4.8 [4.1–6.0] vs 4.2 [3.6–4.9] months, 0.71 [0.57–0.88]; P = 0.0022). PFS was longer in both groups receiving nivolumab vs placebo (Tmab+, 1.6 [1.5–4.0] vs 1.5 [1.3–2.9] months, 0.49 [0.29–0.85]; P = 0.0111; Tmab−, 1.6 [1.5–2.4] vs 1.5 [1.5–1.5] months, 0.64 [0.51–0.80]; P = 0.0001). Conclusions: Nivolumab was efficacious and safe as third- or later-line therapy regardless of prior trastuzumab use in patients with advanced G/GEJ cancer.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)143-153
    Number of pages11
    JournalGastric Cancer
    Volume23
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2020 Jan 1

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher Copyright:
    © 2019, The Author(s).

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • Gastric cancer
    • Gastroesophageal junction cancer
    • Nivolumab
    • Trastuzumab

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Oncology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Cancer Research

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Exploratory subgroup analysis of patients with prior trastuzumab use in the ATTRACTION-2 trial: a randomized phase III clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this