Abstract
We consider the unconditionally stable Newmark and ρ∞-Bathe methods for the direct time integration of the finite element equations in structural dynamics and wave propagations. In our evaluation of the Newmark method we consider the parameters δ and α, and in the ρ∞-Bathe method we consider the parameters γ and ρ∞, with 0<γ<∞,γ≠1 and ρ∞∈[-1,+1]. We show that the Newmark method as usually used with its δ and α parameters, α=0.25(δ+0.5)2 and δ⩾0.5, is a special case of the ρ∞-Bathe method. We also show that the β1/β2-Bathe method is a special case of the ρ∞-Bathe scheme. The study of the curves of numerical dissipation and dispersion shows that the ρ∞-Bathe method provides effective dissipation and dispersion whereas the Newmark method lacks in that regard. To illustrate our theoretical findings we give the results of some example solutions of structural dynamics and wave propagations. Our study also shows that further research is needed to identify the optimal use of the ρ∞-Bathe scheme and other implicit methods in wave propagation analyses.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 106079 |
| Journal | Computers and Structures |
| Volume | 225 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 Dec |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019 Elsevier Ltd
Keywords
- Direct time integrations
- Dissipation and dispersion
- Implicit and explicit schemes
- Newmark and Bathe methods
- Stability and accuracy
- Transient analyses
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Civil and Structural Engineering
- Modelling and Simulation
- General Materials Science
- Mechanical Engineering
- Computer Science Applications
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'For direct time integrations: A comparison of the Newmark and ρ∞-Bathe schemes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS