TY - JOUR
T1 - Hearing tongue loops
T2 - Perceptual sensitivity to acoustic signatures of articulatory dynamics
AU - Nam, Hosung
AU - Mooshammer, Christine
AU - Iskarous, Khalil
AU - Whalen, D. H.
N1 - Funding Information:
This material is based upon work supported by NIH Grant No. DC-002717 to the Haskins Laboratories and NSF Grant No. 1246750 to the University of Southern California. We thank Will Grathwohl and Shabnam Elahi for help with the experiments.
PY - 2013/11
Y1 - 2013/11
N2 - Previous work has shown that velar stops are produced with a forward movement during closure, forming a forward (anterior) loop for a VCV sequence, when the preceding vowels are back or mid. Are listeners aware of this aspect of articulatory dynamics? The current study used articulatory synthesis to examine how such kinematic patterns are reflected in the acoustics, and whether those acoustic patterns elicit different goodness ratings. In Experiment I, the size and direction of loops was modulated in articulatory synthesis. The resulting stimuli were presented to listeners for a naturalness judgment. Results show that listeners rate forward loops as more natural than backward loops, in agreement with typical productions. Acoustic analysis of the synthetic stimuli shows that forward loops exhibit shorter and shallower VC transitions than CV transitions. In Experiment II, three acoustic parameters were employed incorporating F3-F2 distance, transition slope, and transition length to systematically modulate the magnitude of VC and CV transitions. Listeners rated the naturalness in accord with those of Experiment I. This study reveals that there is sufficient information in the acoustic signature of "velar loops" to affect perceptual preference. Similarity to typical productions seemed to determine preferences, not acoustic distinctiveness.
AB - Previous work has shown that velar stops are produced with a forward movement during closure, forming a forward (anterior) loop for a VCV sequence, when the preceding vowels are back or mid. Are listeners aware of this aspect of articulatory dynamics? The current study used articulatory synthesis to examine how such kinematic patterns are reflected in the acoustics, and whether those acoustic patterns elicit different goodness ratings. In Experiment I, the size and direction of loops was modulated in articulatory synthesis. The resulting stimuli were presented to listeners for a naturalness judgment. Results show that listeners rate forward loops as more natural than backward loops, in agreement with typical productions. Acoustic analysis of the synthetic stimuli shows that forward loops exhibit shorter and shallower VC transitions than CV transitions. In Experiment II, three acoustic parameters were employed incorporating F3-F2 distance, transition slope, and transition length to systematically modulate the magnitude of VC and CV transitions. Listeners rated the naturalness in accord with those of Experiment I. This study reveals that there is sufficient information in the acoustic signature of "velar loops" to affect perceptual preference. Similarity to typical productions seemed to determine preferences, not acoustic distinctiveness.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887501510&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1121/1.4824161
DO - 10.1121/1.4824161
M3 - Article
C2 - 24180790
AN - SCOPUS:84887501510
SN - 0001-4966
VL - 134
SP - 3808
EP - 3817
JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
IS - 5
ER -