Heavy metal concentration according to shrimp species and organ specificity: Monitoring and human risk assessment

  • Wook Jin Ra
  • , Hee Joon Yoo
  • , Yeon Hee Kim
  • , Taehyun Yun
  • , Bokyung Soh
  • , Su Yeob Cho
  • , Yongsung Joo
  • , Kwang Won Lee*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study assessed heavy metal levels (lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), total arsenic (tAs), arsenite (As (III)), arsenate (As (V)), monomethyl arsenic acid (MMA), dimethylarsinic acid (DMA), total mercury (tHg), and methylmercury (MeHg)) in six organs (total portion, head, body, shell, muscle, and intestine) of 11 shrimp species distributed in Korea. Shrimp exhibited significant variability in heavy metal accumulation, with Alaskan pink and dried shrimp (Lesser glass, Southern rough, and Chinese ditch prawn) showing the highest metal concentrations. Notably, the intestine having the highest overall metal content, while Cd was most prominent in the head, tHg was highest in the muscle. The Hazard Quotient values of 11 shrimp species in South Korea were below the European Food Safety Authority's allowable limits for heavy metals. This study illuminates the heavy metal profiles of distributed shrimp in Korea and emphasizes the ongoing need for monitoring heavy metals on seafood to ensure consumer safety.

Original languageEnglish
Article number115761
JournalMarine Pollution Bulletin
Volume197
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023 Dec

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Environmental monitoring
  • Heavy metal concentration: human health risk
  • Organ specificity
  • Shrimp

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oceanography
  • Aquatic Science
  • Pollution

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Heavy metal concentration according to shrimp species and organ specificity: Monitoring and human risk assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this