How people vote in contests: new findings from Immortal Songs 2

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Many important contests, such as job interviews and political debates, are presented in sequential order. Previous studies found serial position effects such that the later presenter has a higher probability of winning. However, no previous studies use both random assignments of contestants and a large number of contestants and judges. We use Immortal Songs 2, a popular TV program that satisfies both conditions, to confirm the findings of serial position effects. In addition, Immortal Songs 2 has round-by-round competition rules. The first round is a competition between the first and second contestants. Then, the winner of the first round is announced. The second round is a contest between the winner of the first round and the third contestant. As the rounds continue, in theory, the winner of the previous round should have a higher probability of winning; however, in fact, the second contestant’s probability of winning is always 0.5.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)45-62
    Number of pages18
    JournalJournal of Cultural Economics
    Volume45
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2021 Mar

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher Copyright:
    © 2020, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

    Keywords

    • Momentary fairness bias
    • Preference
    • Serial position effects
    • Step-by-step

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'How people vote in contests: new findings from Immortal Songs 2'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this