TY - JOUR
T1 - Individual, interpersonal, and organisational factors of healthcare conflict
T2 - A scoping review
AU - Kim, Sara
AU - Bochatay, Naike
AU - Relyea-Chew, Annemarie
AU - Buttrick, Elizabeth
AU - Amdahl, Chris
AU - Kim, Laura
AU - Frans, Elise
AU - Mossanen, Matthew
AU - Khandekar, Azhar
AU - Fehr, Ryan
AU - Lee, Young Mee
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors wish to acknowledge the Arnold P. Gold Foundation and the UW Medicine PSIP (Patient Safety Innovations Program) for their generous support towards this study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Taylor & Francis.
PY - 2017/5/4
Y1 - 2017/5/4
N2 - Unresolved conflicts among healthcare professionals can lead to difficult patient care consequences. This scoping review examines the current healthcare literature that reported sources and consequences of conflict associated with individual, interpersonal, and organisational factors. We identified 99 articles published between 2001 and 2015 from PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Excerpta Medical Database. Most reviewed studies relied on healthcare professionals’ perceptions and beliefs associated with conflict sources and consequences, with few studies reporting behavioural or organisational change outcomes. Individual conflict sources included personal traits, such as self-focus, self-esteem, or worldview, as well as individuals’ conflict management styles. These conflicts posed threats to one’s physical, mental, and emotional health and to one’s ability to perform at work. Interpersonal dynamics were hampered by colleagues’ uncivil behaviours, such as low degree of support, to more destructive behaviours including bullying or humiliation. Perceptions of disrespectful working environment and weakened team collaboration were the main interpersonal conflict consequences. Organisational conflict sources included ambiguity in professional roles, scope of practice, reporting structure, or workflows, negatively affecting healthcare professionals’ job satisfactions and intent to stay. Future inquiries into healthcare conflict research may target the following: shifting from research involving single professions to multiple professions; dissemination of studies via journals that promote interprofessional research; inquiries into the roles of unconscious or implicit bias, or psychological capital (i.e., resilience) in healthcare conflict; and diversification of data sources to include hospital or clinic data with implications for conflict sources.
AB - Unresolved conflicts among healthcare professionals can lead to difficult patient care consequences. This scoping review examines the current healthcare literature that reported sources and consequences of conflict associated with individual, interpersonal, and organisational factors. We identified 99 articles published between 2001 and 2015 from PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Excerpta Medical Database. Most reviewed studies relied on healthcare professionals’ perceptions and beliefs associated with conflict sources and consequences, with few studies reporting behavioural or organisational change outcomes. Individual conflict sources included personal traits, such as self-focus, self-esteem, or worldview, as well as individuals’ conflict management styles. These conflicts posed threats to one’s physical, mental, and emotional health and to one’s ability to perform at work. Interpersonal dynamics were hampered by colleagues’ uncivil behaviours, such as low degree of support, to more destructive behaviours including bullying or humiliation. Perceptions of disrespectful working environment and weakened team collaboration were the main interpersonal conflict consequences. Organisational conflict sources included ambiguity in professional roles, scope of practice, reporting structure, or workflows, negatively affecting healthcare professionals’ job satisfactions and intent to stay. Future inquiries into healthcare conflict research may target the following: shifting from research involving single professions to multiple professions; dissemination of studies via journals that promote interprofessional research; inquiries into the roles of unconscious or implicit bias, or psychological capital (i.e., resilience) in healthcare conflict; and diversification of data sources to include hospital or clinic data with implications for conflict sources.
KW - Collaboration
KW - communication
KW - conflict
KW - interprofessional relations
KW - scoping review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013485310&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13561820.2016.1272558
DO - 10.1080/13561820.2016.1272558
M3 - Article
C2 - 28276847
AN - SCOPUS:85013485310
SN - 1356-1820
VL - 31
SP - 282
EP - 290
JO - Journal of Interprofessional Care
JF - Journal of Interprofessional Care
IS - 3
ER -