Abstract
Modern machine learning force fields (ML-FF) are able to yield energy and force predictions at the accuracy of high-level ab initio methods, but at a much lower computational cost. On the other hand, classical molecular mechanics force fields (MM-FF) employ fixed functional forms and tend to be less accurate, but considerably faster and transferable between molecules of the same class. In this work, we investigate how both approaches can complement each other. We contrast the ability of ML-FF for reconstructing dynamic and thermodynamic observables to MM-FFs in order to gain a qualitative understanding of the differences between the two approaches. This analysis enables us to modify the generalized AMBER force field by reparametrizing short-range and bonded interactions with more expressive terms to make them more accurate, without sacrificing the key properties that make MM-FFs so successful.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 124109 |
| Journal | Journal of Chemical Physics |
| Volume | 153 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2020 Sept 28 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2020 Author(s).
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Physics and Astronomy
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Molecular force fields with gradient-domain machine learning (GDML): Comparison and synergies with classical force fields'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS