Nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics in foliage and twig of pitch pine and japanese larch plantations in relation to fertilization

Yowhan Son, Im Kyun Lee, Soung Ryoul Ryu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Seasonal foliage and twig nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) dynamics were determined for 40-year-old pitch pine (Pinus rigida Mill.) and Japanese larch (Larix leptolepis Gord.) plantations established on similar soils in central Korea. Also, the effects of three levels of N plus P fertilizers on N and P retranslocation were evaluated. In general, Japanese larch had significantly higher current foliage N and P concentrations than pitch pine, and N and P concentrations were higher in foliage than those in twigs for both study species. Foliage N and P concentrations were highest in mid-growing season and lowest in autumn whereas twig N and P concentrations increased during foliage senescence, suggesting that twig served as a storage tissue. We did not find differences in foliage N and P retranslocation between pitch pine and Japanese larch; current foliage N and P retranslocation of the control trees were 35% and 56% for pitch pine, and 39% and 59% for Japanese larch, respectively. There were no consistent patterns in foliage and twig N and P retranslocation following fertilization.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)697-710
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Plant Nutrition
Volume23
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Financial support was provided by the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF 961-0608-069-2). We thank Jae Hong Hwang, Jung Ah Shin, Hyun Seop Kim, and Rae Hyun Kim for field sampling and nutrient analyses.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Agronomy and Crop Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics in foliage and twig of pitch pine and japanese larch plantations in relation to fertilization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this