Optimal combinations of global evapotranspiration and terrestrial water storage products for catchment water balance

During the last two decades, a great number of global products about evapotranspiration ((Formula presented.)) and terrestrial water storage ((Formula presented.)) have been released. This has led to numerous combinations for describing catchment water balance, and hence determining an appropriate combination has become an important issue. The main objective of this study is to evaluate various global products of (Formula presented.) and (Formula presented.) at the catchment scale and determine the most appropriate combination, taking two Korean catchments as examples. For (Formula presented.), we evaluated global evapotranspiration (Global ET), Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam Model (GLEAM), and Penman–Monteith–Leuning (PML). For (Formula presented.), six individual datasets of Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) were evaluated, with Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) products used for comparison. We found that the performance is sensitive to the choice of (Formula presented.) product while various (Formula presented.) products displayed minimal differences in results. Based on four evaluation criteria, the combination of PML and GRACE-SH-GFZ is suggested as the most suitable pair. For the period between 2003 and 2013, these data exhibit noteworthy trends of increasing (Formula presented.), offset by decreasing (Formula presented.). Warming climate is suspected to be behind these trends. Our research presents an approach that allows for the estimation of monthly streamflow exclusively with global data products, which is an advancement in hydrological analysis and particularly useful for regions that lack in-situ data networks. This approach provides a new perspective in the application of global datasets for the assessment of water balance and could significantly improve predictions in ungauged basins.