Abstract
Despite the growing interest of producers and consumers toward grass-fed, local, and organic beef, the supply chain for these products to reach consumers is not always clear-cut. Among the available options are direct-to-consumers and the conventional food supply chain. Although consumers may pay a premium for beef differentiated by quality attributes, the willingness to pay (WTP) difference across point-of-sales is unclear. In this study, we contrast the WTPs for conventional, grass-fed, local, and organic beef by brick-and-mortar supermarkets (B & Ms), farmers' markets, and via online stores. We conduct a choice experiment with a nationwide online sample of American consumers. The findings indicate that compared to B & Ms, more consumers are reluctant to purchase beef from farmers' markets and online outlets. Moreover, the WTP for quality-differentiated attributes varies significantly by the point-of-sales. For most consumers, the downside of online or farmers' markets outweighs the upside of the quality-differentiated attributes sold in those venues.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 2560 |
Journal | Sustainability (Switzerland) |
Volume | 10 |
Issue number | 7 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2018 Jul 21 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2018 by the authors.
Keywords
- Beefsteak
- Farmers' market
- Grass-fed
- Local
- Online grocery
- Organic
- Willingness to pay
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
- Energy Engineering and Power Technology
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law