TY - JOUR
T1 - Prediction of high-grade ureteral urothelial carcinoma on CT urography
AU - Hwang, Sung Tae
AU - Sung, Deuk Jae
AU - Yang, Kyung Sook
AU - Sim, Ki Choon
AU - Han, Na Yeon
AU - Park, Beom Jin
AU - Kim, Min Ju
AU - Cho, Sung Bum
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Objective: To evaluate the correlation between CT urography (CTU) findings and histological grade of ureteral urothelial carcinoma (UUC), and to identify predictors of high-grade UUC. Methods: CTU images of 73 patients with pathologically proven UUC via nephroureterectomy were independently reviewed by two radiologists for tumour size, tumour location, hydronephrosis grade, periureteral infiltration, presence of enlarged retroperitoneal lymph nodes and tumour enhancement value. Interobserver agreement was assessed with kappa statistics. Histological grade was classified as either low or high according to the WHO 2004 classification system and pathologic T stage was assessed according to the TNM staging system. Binary logistic regression, Spearman correlation analysis and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate relationships between CTU findings and histological grade. Results: 58 patients had high-grade UUCs and 15 had low-grade UUCs. Among CTU features, only hydronephrosis grade was significantly correlated with high tumour grade for both readers (p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that hydronephrosis of Grade 3 or higher was a significantly independent predictor of high-grade UUC for both readers (p ≤ 0.004). Interobserver agreement was excellent for hydronephrosis grade (= 0.862). With the cut-off value of hydronephrosis Grade 3, the sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve for predicting high-grade UUC were, respectively, 88%, 79% and 0.830 for reader 1 and 86%, 80% and 0.763 for reader 2. Conclusion: Hydronephrosis of Grade 3 or higher on CTU may be predictive of high-grade UUC. Advances in knowledge: Radical surgery should be considered for UUC causing hydronephrosis of Grade 3 or higher on CTU, even in small tumours without periureteral infiltration.
AB - Objective: To evaluate the correlation between CT urography (CTU) findings and histological grade of ureteral urothelial carcinoma (UUC), and to identify predictors of high-grade UUC. Methods: CTU images of 73 patients with pathologically proven UUC via nephroureterectomy were independently reviewed by two radiologists for tumour size, tumour location, hydronephrosis grade, periureteral infiltration, presence of enlarged retroperitoneal lymph nodes and tumour enhancement value. Interobserver agreement was assessed with kappa statistics. Histological grade was classified as either low or high according to the WHO 2004 classification system and pathologic T stage was assessed according to the TNM staging system. Binary logistic regression, Spearman correlation analysis and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate relationships between CTU findings and histological grade. Results: 58 patients had high-grade UUCs and 15 had low-grade UUCs. Among CTU features, only hydronephrosis grade was significantly correlated with high tumour grade for both readers (p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that hydronephrosis of Grade 3 or higher was a significantly independent predictor of high-grade UUC for both readers (p ≤ 0.004). Interobserver agreement was excellent for hydronephrosis grade (= 0.862). With the cut-off value of hydronephrosis Grade 3, the sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve for predicting high-grade UUC were, respectively, 88%, 79% and 0.830 for reader 1 and 86%, 80% and 0.763 for reader 2. Conclusion: Hydronephrosis of Grade 3 or higher on CTU may be predictive of high-grade UUC. Advances in knowledge: Radical surgery should be considered for UUC causing hydronephrosis of Grade 3 or higher on CTU, even in small tumours without periureteral infiltration.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030761910&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1259/bjr.20170159
DO - 10.1259/bjr.20170159
M3 - Article
C2 - 28830196
AN - SCOPUS:85030761910
SN - 0007-1285
VL - 90
JO - British Journal of Radiology
JF - British Journal of Radiology
IS - 1078
M1 - 20170159
ER -