Prognostic significance of infection acquisition sites in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: Nosocomial versus community acquired

Young Song Joon, Ju Jung Seong, Won Park Cheong, Wook Sohn Jang, Joo Kim Woo, Ja Kim Min, Jin Cheong Hee

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    58 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is an ascitic fluid infection as a complication of end stage liver disease. The outcome is related to the severity of hepatorenal function, gastrointestinal bleeding, and many others; however it is not well known whether the infection acquisition sites have an effect on the prognosis of SBP. In order to identify the prognostic significance of the acquisition sites, we studied 106 patients who were diagnosed as culture positive SBP between October 1998 and August 2003. Thirty-two episodes were nosocomial and 74 were community acquired. Gram-negative bacilli such as Escherichia coli were dominant in both of the nosocomial and community-acquired SBPs. Despite significantly higher resistance to cefotaxime in nosocomial isolates compared to community-acquired isolates (77.8% vs. 13.6%, p=0.001), no difference was found regarding short or long term prognosis. Infection acquisition sites were not related to short or long term prognosis either. Shock, gastrointestinal bleeding and renal dysfunction were related to short term prognosis. Only Child-Pugh class C was identified as an independent prognostic factor of long-term survival.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)666-671
    Number of pages6
    JournalJournal of Korean medical science
    Volume21
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2006

    Keywords

    • Community-Acquired Infections
    • Cross infection
    • Liver cirrhosis
    • Peritonitis

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General Medicine

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Prognostic significance of infection acquisition sites in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: Nosocomial versus community acquired'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this