TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantitative analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas
T2 - Usefulness in characterizing solid pancreatic masses
AU - Seung, Soo Lee
AU - Jae, Ho Byun
AU - Beom, Jin Park
AU - Seong, Ho Park
AU - Kim, Namkug
AU - Park, Bumwoo
AU - Jeong, Kon Kim
AU - Lee, Moon Gyu
PY - 2008/10
Y1 - 2008/10
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate whether measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and pure diffusion coefficient (D) can help to characterize solid pancreatic masses. Materials and Methods: Diffusion-weighted MR imaging was performed in both a patient group (n = 71; pancreatic cancer [n = 47], mass-forming pancreatitis [n = 13], solid pseudopapillary neoplasm [n = 6], and neuroendocrine tumor [n = 5]) and a normal control group (n = 11) by applying three b-factors of 0, 500, and 1000 sec/mm2. ADC500, ADC1000, D (ADC using b = 500 and 1000 sec/mm2), and perfusion fraction (f, 1- exp [-500 sec/mm2 x (ADC500 - D)]) of normal pancreas, pancreatic cancer, and mass-forming pancreatitis were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance and optimal cutoff value of these parameters in differentiating pancreatic cancer from mass-forming pancreatitis. Results: Normal pancreas had significantly higher mean ADC500, ADC1000, and f than either pancreatic cancer (P < 0.001, < 0.001, and 0.004, respectively) or mass-forming pancreatitis (P < 0.001, < 0.001, and 0.002, respectively). ADC500, ADC1000, and D of mass-forming pancreatitis were significantly lower than those of pancreatic cancer (P = 0.002, 0.004, and 0.014, respectively). Sensitivities and specificities in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer were 72.3% and 76.9% for ADC500, 87.2% and 69.2% for ADC1000, 87.2% and 61.5% for D, and 42.6% and 92.3% for f, respectively. Conclusion: Measurement of ADC and D may be helpful in differentiating pancreatic cancers from mass-forming pancreatitis.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate whether measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and pure diffusion coefficient (D) can help to characterize solid pancreatic masses. Materials and Methods: Diffusion-weighted MR imaging was performed in both a patient group (n = 71; pancreatic cancer [n = 47], mass-forming pancreatitis [n = 13], solid pseudopapillary neoplasm [n = 6], and neuroendocrine tumor [n = 5]) and a normal control group (n = 11) by applying three b-factors of 0, 500, and 1000 sec/mm2. ADC500, ADC1000, D (ADC using b = 500 and 1000 sec/mm2), and perfusion fraction (f, 1- exp [-500 sec/mm2 x (ADC500 - D)]) of normal pancreas, pancreatic cancer, and mass-forming pancreatitis were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance and optimal cutoff value of these parameters in differentiating pancreatic cancer from mass-forming pancreatitis. Results: Normal pancreas had significantly higher mean ADC500, ADC1000, and f than either pancreatic cancer (P < 0.001, < 0.001, and 0.004, respectively) or mass-forming pancreatitis (P < 0.001, < 0.001, and 0.002, respectively). ADC500, ADC1000, and D of mass-forming pancreatitis were significantly lower than those of pancreatic cancer (P = 0.002, 0.004, and 0.014, respectively). Sensitivities and specificities in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer were 72.3% and 76.9% for ADC500, 87.2% and 69.2% for ADC1000, 87.2% and 61.5% for D, and 42.6% and 92.3% for f, respectively. Conclusion: Measurement of ADC and D may be helpful in differentiating pancreatic cancers from mass-forming pancreatitis.
KW - Diffusion-weighted imaging
KW - MRI
KW - Pancreas
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=53549087517&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jmri.21508
DO - 10.1002/jmri.21508
M3 - Article
C2 - 18821618
AN - SCOPUS:53549087517
SN - 1053-1807
VL - 28
SP - 928
EP - 936
JO - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
JF - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
IS - 4
ER -