Abstract
The Korean Cancer Pain Assessment Tool (KCPAT), which was developed in 2003, consists of questions concerning the location of pain, the nature of pain, the present pain intensity, the symptoms associated with the pain, and psychosodal/spiritual pain assessments. This study was carried out to evaluate the reliability and validity of the KCPAT. A stratified, proportional-quota, clustered, systematic sampling procedure was used. The study population (903 cancer patients) was 1% of the target population (90,252 cancer patients). A total of 314 (34.8%) questionnaires were collected. The results showed that the average pain score (5 point on Likert scale) according to the cancer type and the at-present average pain score (VAS, 0-10) were correlated (r=0.56, p<0.0001), and showed moderate agreement (kappa=0.364). The mean satisfaction score was 3.8 (1-5). The average time to complete the questionnaire was 8.9 min. In conclusion, the KCPAT is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing cancer pain in Koreans.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 877-882 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Journal of Korean medical science |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2005 Oct |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Korean
- Neoplasms
- Pain
- Pain Measurement
- Reliability
- Reproducibility of Results
- Validity
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Medicine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability and validity of the korean cancer pain assessment tool (KCPAT) (Retraction in: Journal of Korean Medical Science (2006) 21:6 (1139))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS