Abstract
In their comment, Park & Ree have raised several points against the interpretation by Park et al., and argued that the remagnetization in the Jeongseon area was caused by the thermal effects of a Late Cretaceous pluton and/or associated short-range hydrothermal fluids, rather than by long-range fluids advocated by us. We disagree with mostpoints raised by Park & Ree and we make a case that these are invalid because of what we believe is incorrect geologic evidence. Hence, our model-that the fluids causing the chemical remagnetization might migrate through the fault system within the Ogcheon Fold Belt - is the most plausible scenario. We recognize that our model needs to be tested in a future study and we welcome new interpretations for or against our model based on reliable geologic or geophysical data.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 20-23 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Geophysical Journal International |
Volume | 167 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs |
|
Publication status | Published - 2006 Oct |
Keywords
- Chemical remagnetization
- Fluid migration
- Korea
- Palaeomagnetism
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geophysics
- Geochemistry and Petrology