Abstract
Background: Using a toolkit approach, Tsuda et al. critiqued work carried out by or in collaboration with the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), including the IARC technical publication No. 46 on “Thyroid health monitoring after nuclear accidents” (TM-NUC), the project on nuclear emergency situations and improvement on medical and health surveillance (SHAMISEN), and the IARC-led work on global thyroid cancer incidence patterns as per IARC core mandate. Main body: We respond on the criticism of the recommendations of the IARC technical publication No. 46, and of global thyroid cancer incidence evaluation. Conclusion: After nuclear accidents, overdiagnosis can still happen and must be included in informed decision making when providing a system of optimal help for cases of radiation-induced thyroid cancer, to minimize harm to people by helping them avoid diagnostics and treatment they may not need.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 13 |
Journal | Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source |
Volume | 22 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs |
|
Publication status | Published - 2023 Dec |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023, The Author(s).
Keywords
- Incidence
- Nuclear accident
- Overdiagnosis
- Thyroid cancer
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis