Six-month versus 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stents: The efficacy of xience/promus versus cypher to reduce late loss after stenting (EXCELLENT) randomized, multicenter study

  • Hyeon Cheol Gwon
  • , Joo Yong Hahn
  • , Kyung Woo Park
  • , Young Bin Song
  • , In Ho Chae
  • , Do Sun Lim
  • , Kyoo Rok Han
  • , Jin Ho Choi
  • , Seung Hyuk Choi
  • , Hyun Jae Kang
  • , Bon Kwon Koo
  • , Taehoon Ahn
  • , Jung Han Yoon
  • , Myung Ho Jeong
  • , Taek Jong Hong
  • , Woo Young Chung
  • , Young Jin Choi
  • , Seung Ho Hur
  • , Hyuck Moon Kwon
  • , Dong Woon Jeon
  • Byung Ok Kim, Si Hoon Park, Nam Ho Lee, Hui Kyung Jeon, Yangsoo Jang, Hyo Soo Kim*
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND-: The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after implantation of drug-eluting coronary stents remains undetermined. We aimed to test whether 6-month DAPT would be noninferior to 12-month DAPT after implantation of drug-eluting stents. METHODS AND RESULTS-: We randomly assigned 1443 patients undergoing implantation of drug-eluting stents to receive 6- or 12-month DAPT (in a 1:1 ratio). The primary end point was a target vessel failure, defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization at 12 months. Rates of target vessel failure at 12 months were 4.8% in the 6-month DAPT group and 4.3% in the 12-month DAPT group (the upper limit of 1-sided 95% confidence interval, 2.4%; P=0.001 for noninferiority with a predefined noninferiority margin of 4.0%). Although stent thrombosis tended to occur more frequently in the 6-month DAPT group than in the 12-month group (0.9% versus 0.1%; hazard ratio, 6.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-49.96; P=0.10), the risk of death or myocardial infarction did not differ in the 2 groups (2.4% versus 1.9%; hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-2.47; P=0.58). In the prespecified subgroup analysis, target vessel failure occurred more frequently in the 6-month DAPT group than in the 12-month group (hazard ratio, 3.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-7.03; P=0.005) among diabetic patients. CONCLUSIONS-: Six-month DAPT did not increase the risk of target vessel failure at 12 months after implantation of drug-eluting stents compared with 12-month DAPT. However, the noninferiority margin was wide, and the study was underpowered for death or myocardial infarction. Our results need to be confirmed in larger trials. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION-: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00698607.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)505-513
Number of pages9
JournalCirculation
Volume125
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Jan 24

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • drug-eluting stents
  • platelet aggregation inhibitors
  • stents
  • thrombosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Six-month versus 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stents: The efficacy of xience/promus versus cypher to reduce late loss after stenting (EXCELLENT) randomized, multicenter study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this