Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating diagnostic test accuracy: A practical review for clinical researchers–part I. general guidance and tips

  • Kyung Won Kim
  • , Juneyoung Lee
  • , Sang Hyun Choi
  • , Jimi Huh
  • , Seong Ho Park*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

In the field of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA), the use of systematic review and meta-analyses is steadily increasing. By means of objective evaluation of all available primary studies, these two processes generate an evidence-based systematic summary regarding a specific research topic. The methodology for systematic review and meta-analysis in DTA studies differs from that in therapeutic/interventional studies, and its content is still evolving. Here we review the overall process from a practical standpoint, which may serve as a reference for those who implement these methods.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1175-1187
Number of pages13
JournalKorean journal of radiology
Volume16
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Nov

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 The Korean Society of Radiology.

Keywords

  • Diagnostic test accuracy
  • Meta-analysis
  • Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating diagnostic test accuracy: A practical review for clinical researchers–part I. general guidance and tips'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this