TY - JOUR
T1 - The 2016 Gyeongju earthquake sequence revisited
T2 - Aftershock interactions within a complex fault system
AU - Woo, Jeong Ung
AU - Rhie, Junkee
AU - Kim, Seongryong
AU - Kang, Tae Seob
AU - Kim, Kwang Hee
AU - Kim, Young Hee
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank the Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA) and Korea Institute of Geosciences and Mineral Resources (KIGAM) for sharing continuous waveform data for this study. Hobin Lim, Takahiko Uchide, Seok Goo Song, Miao Zhang, Chang-Soo Cho and two anonymous reviewers provided careful comments and suggestions which improved the manuscript. We are grateful not only to all the landowners and organizations that allowed us to install and operate temporary seismic stations on their properties but also to the graduate students in the Gyeongju earthquake research group for maintaining the temporary seismic network. Source parameters of the earthquakes analysed in this study is available at https://github.com/Jeong-Ung/GJ. This work was supported by the Nuclear Safety Research Program through the Korea Foundation of Nuclear Safety (KoFONS) using the financial resources granted by the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission (NSSC) of the Republic of Korea (No. 1705010).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Author(s).
PY - 2019/4/1
Y1 - 2019/4/1
N2 - On 2016 September 12, a moderate earthquake (ML 5.8) occurred in Gyeongju, South Korea, located hundreds of kilometres away from the nearest plate boundaries. The earthquake, the largest instrumentally recorded event in South Korea, occurred in a sequence of thousands of earthquakes, including a ML 5.1 event 50 min before the main quake and a ML 4.5 event a week later. As a case study, we analyse the source parameters of the 2016 Gyeongju earthquake sequence: precise relocations, fault structures, focal mechanisms, stress tensor analysis and Coulomb stress changes. To determine high-resolution hypocentres and focal mechanisms, we employ our temporary seismic network for aftershock monitoring as well as regional permanent seismic networks. The spatiooral distribution of events and inverted moment tensors indicate that the ML 5.1 event and the ML 5.8 event occurred on two parallel dextral faults striking NNE-SSW at a depth of 11-16 km, and the ML 4.5 event occurred on their conjugate fault with sinistral displacements. Seismicity on the fault for the ML 5.1 event abruptly decreased as soon as the ML 5.8 event occurred. This is not solely explained by the Coulomb stress change and requires more complex processes to explain it. The tectonic stress field obtained from inverted focal mechanisms suggests that the heterogeneity between the intermediate and minimum principal stresses exists along the NNE-SSW and vertical directions. The Coulomb stress changes imparted from the ML 5.1 event and the ML 5.8 event are matched with the off-fault seismicity, including that from the ML 4.5 event. Multifaceted observations, such as Coulomb stress interactions between parallel or conjugate faults and the heterogeneity of the tectonic stress field in the aftershock area, may reflect the reactivation processes of a complex fault system. This study offers a distinctive case study to understand the general characteristics of intraplate earthquakes in multifault systems.
AB - On 2016 September 12, a moderate earthquake (ML 5.8) occurred in Gyeongju, South Korea, located hundreds of kilometres away from the nearest plate boundaries. The earthquake, the largest instrumentally recorded event in South Korea, occurred in a sequence of thousands of earthquakes, including a ML 5.1 event 50 min before the main quake and a ML 4.5 event a week later. As a case study, we analyse the source parameters of the 2016 Gyeongju earthquake sequence: precise relocations, fault structures, focal mechanisms, stress tensor analysis and Coulomb stress changes. To determine high-resolution hypocentres and focal mechanisms, we employ our temporary seismic network for aftershock monitoring as well as regional permanent seismic networks. The spatiooral distribution of events and inverted moment tensors indicate that the ML 5.1 event and the ML 5.8 event occurred on two parallel dextral faults striking NNE-SSW at a depth of 11-16 km, and the ML 4.5 event occurred on their conjugate fault with sinistral displacements. Seismicity on the fault for the ML 5.1 event abruptly decreased as soon as the ML 5.8 event occurred. This is not solely explained by the Coulomb stress change and requires more complex processes to explain it. The tectonic stress field obtained from inverted focal mechanisms suggests that the heterogeneity between the intermediate and minimum principal stresses exists along the NNE-SSW and vertical directions. The Coulomb stress changes imparted from the ML 5.1 event and the ML 5.8 event are matched with the off-fault seismicity, including that from the ML 4.5 event. Multifaceted observations, such as Coulomb stress interactions between parallel or conjugate faults and the heterogeneity of the tectonic stress field in the aftershock area, may reflect the reactivation processes of a complex fault system. This study offers a distinctive case study to understand the general characteristics of intraplate earthquakes in multifault systems.
KW - Continental neotectonics
KW - Dynamics and mechanics of faulting
KW - Dynamics: seismotectonics
KW - Earthquake interaction, forecasting, and prediction
KW - Earthquake source observations
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066747475&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/gji/ggz009
DO - 10.1093/gji/ggz009
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85066747475
SN - 0956-540X
VL - 217
SP - 58
EP - 74
JO - Geophysical Journal International
JF - Geophysical Journal International
IS - 1
ER -