The financial system and the Pasinetti theorem

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Palley (Inside debt, aggregate demand, and the Cambridge theory of distribution, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 20, no. 4, 465-74, 1996; Financial institutions and the Cambridge theory of distribution, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 26, no. 2, 275-7, 2002) considers the Pasinetti theorem in the context of the credit money system where banks generate debts endogenously, and claims that the theorem ceases to hold in such a system, being valid only in the loanable funds system. This paper traces the root of Palley's claim to his assumption regarding the ownership of banks, sets out an alternative (more realistic) ownership arrangement, and thereby restores the Pasinetti theorem unscathed in the credit money system (at least in the kind Palley must have considered). The paper, however, uncovers the case where the theorem indeed collapses and discusses the reason for it: the hoarding of a non-interest-bearing asset.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)201-217
    Number of pages17
    JournalCambridge Journal of Economics
    Volume30
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2006 Mar

    Bibliographical note

    Copyright:
    Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

    Keywords

    • Credit money system
    • Loanable funds system
    • Pasinetti theorem

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics and Econometrics

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The financial system and the Pasinetti theorem'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this