The significance of serum phosphate level on healing index and its relative effects in skeletally immature and mature patients with hypophosphatemic rickets

Sang Heon Song, Hanna Lee, Ji Min Jeong, Woo In Cho, Sung Eun Kim, Hae Ryong Song

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The aim of this study was to find out the ideal cut-off level of phosphate for safe healing when deformity correction and concomitant lengthening are indicated in the two different skeletal maturity groups of patients with rickets. Thirty-nine hypophosphatemic rickets patients were selected for the study and were divided into two groups: 27 skeletally immature (group IM) and 12 skeletally mature (group M). The outcomes were evaluated with respect to the healing index (HI), laboratory findings, and complications with the mean follow-up of 5.1 years (range, 3.1-7.9). The healing index (HI) of group IM was 1.44 month/cm and HI of group M was 1.68 month/cm. The negative correlation between the level of serum phosphate and HI in group M (coefficient = -0.94) was evaluated to be less than the correlation in group IM (coefficient = -0.50), indicating that the HI is more likely to be affected by serum phosphate in group M than in group IM. Preoperative serum phosphate levels of 2.3 mg/dL and 2.6 mg/dL were analyzed to be the cut-off values of group IM and group M, respectively, in which the cut-off points divided the series into two groups having the most significantly different HI.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number569530
    JournalBioMed Research International
    Volume2014
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
    • General Immunology and Microbiology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The significance of serum phosphate level on healing index and its relative effects in skeletally immature and mature patients with hypophosphatemic rickets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this