Traction injury of the recurrent laryngeal nerve: Results of continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring in a swine model

  • Hye Yoon Lee
  • , Young Geon Cho
  • , Ji Young You
  • , Byoung Ho Choi
  • , Joon Yub Kim
  • , Che Wei Wu
  • , Feng Yu Chiang
  • , Hoon Yub Kim*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    26 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy is the most serious complication after thyroidectomy. However, little is known about the degree of traction injury that causes loss of signal. The purpose of this study was to evaluate traction injuries in the swine RLN using continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) and determine the traction power that results in loss of signal. Methods Thirteen swine underwent traction injury to the RLNs with continuous IONM, and stress-strain curves were determined for 8 nerves using the universal material testing machine in an ex vivo model. Results Traction injury at a mean power of 2.83 MPa caused loss of signal. The mean physiologic limit strain and tensile strength of the swine RLNs were found to be 15.0% and 4.9 MPa, respectively. Histological analysis showed no abnormal structural findings. Conclusion Traction injury of swine RLNs causes loss of signal at a power of 2.83 MPa. However, all injured nerves recovered within 7 days with no observed structural damage.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)582-588
    Number of pages7
    JournalHead and Neck
    Volume38
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016 Apr 1

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher Copyright:
    © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

    Keywords

    • intraoperative neuromonitoring
    • recurrent laryngeal nerve
    • swine model
    • thyroidectomy
    • traction injury

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Otorhinolaryngology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Traction injury of the recurrent laryngeal nerve: Results of continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring in a swine model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this